CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 06, 2026

Mutation Without Variation: Convergence Dynamics in LLM-Driven Program Evolution

arXiv AI Archived Jun 06, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.05408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM repeatedly mutates a program, does it explore new forms or circle back to the same ones? We study this question by analyzing LLM-driven mutation chains in the absence of selection pressure within a domain-specific language, varying prompt design, model family, and stochastic replication. We find that LLM-based mutation consistently converges toward restricted attractor regions in program space. Convergence is especially severe at the st

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 3 Jun 2026] Mutation Without Variation: Convergence Dynamics in LLM-Driven Program Evolution Can Gurkan, Forrest Stonedahl, Uri Wilensky When an LLM repeatedly mutates a program, does it explore new forms or circle back to the same ones? We study this question by analyzing LLM-driven mutation chains in the absence of selection pressure within a domain-specific language, varying prompt design, model family, and stochastic replication. We find that LLM-based mutation consistently converges toward restricted attractor regions in program space. Convergence is especially severe at the structural level: in 87% of chains, over 93% of mutations revisit a previously seen structural form, with most variation confined to terminal substitutions within recurring templates. Cycle analysis reveals short cycles and self-loops dominating the transition structure. The rate of convergence varies with prompt wording and model choice, but the phenomenon is robust across conditions. A classical GP subtree mutation operator does not exhibit comparable convergence, suggesting that the effect is intrinsic to the LLM mutation pipeline. These findings reveal a tension at the heart of LLM-driven program evolution: the same capabilities that enable semantics-aware program transformation also carry a systematic bias toward structural homogeneity that must be accounted for if such systems are to sustain open-ended exploration. Source code is available at this https URL. Comments: Accepted to the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '26) Workshop on Large Language Models for and with Evolutionary Computation Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE) Cite as: arXiv:2606.05408 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.05408v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05408 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Can Gurkan [view email] [v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 20:22:29 UTC (2,269 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.NE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 06, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 06, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗