Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale
arXiv QuantumArchived Jun 05, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.05311v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a powerful heuristic that seeks to solve combinatorial optimization problems using quantum hardware and classical optimization in tandem. Various methods exist to train the parameterized quantum circuits that serve as an ansatz in QAOA. However, which method works best to identify optimal angles for a given problem instance remains poorly understood, especially at utility-scale, i.e., $100$ q
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]
Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale
Maosheng Guo, Joel Jurado Diaz, Anurag Ramesh, Conrad J. Haupt, Alberto Baiardi, Dimitrios Athanasakos, M. Emre Sahin, Oscar Wallis, George Pennington, Christian Arenz, Sebastian Brandhofer, Georgios Korpas, Ieva Čepaitė, J. A. Montañez-Barrera, Jakub Marecek, Davide Venturelli, Stephan Eidenbenz, David E. Bernal Neira, Daniel J. Egger
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a powerful heuristic that seeks to solve combinatorial optimization problems using quantum hardware and classical optimization in tandem. Various methods exist to train the parameterized quantum circuits that serve as an ansatz in QAOA. However, which method works best to identify optimal angles for a given problem instance remains poorly understood, especially at utility-scale, i.e., 100 qubits or more. In this work, we address this challenge through utility-scale benchmarks from which we distill operational guidance for QAOA practitioners. First, we investigate approximation techniques, such as matrix product states and Pauli propagation, to find optimal angles. Second, we train QAOA on small-scale representative problems and transfer the angles to larger ones. We then validate the results on quantum hardware for utility-scale problem instances that can be meaningfully executed. In this way, we identify insights for QAOA angle setting strategies that work best for problems at the utility scale, including as a function of resource cost for the search. Crucially, the operational implications we draw from our benchmarks will help quantum optimization practitioners execute QAOA end-to-end pipelines efficiently on current and future hardware.
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.05311 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.05311v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05311
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Daniel Egger [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 18:02:26 UTC (2,261 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)