CRESS: Quantifying Vulnerabilities of Attack Scenarios in Hardware Reverse Engineering
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 05, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.05459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The safety, security, and reliability of microelectronic systems depend on a trustworthy, secured supply chain and design flow. Globally distributed supply chains or unintentional design weaknesses leave the door open for attacks on the hardware level. These scenarios encompass counterfeiting, hardware trojans, or on-device attacks. For these, hardware reverse engineering (RE) results play a pivotal role. The ongoing publication of new RE-involved
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]
CRESS: Quantifying Vulnerabilities of Attack Scenarios in Hardware Reverse Engineering
Alexander Hepp, Matthias Ludwig, Michaela Brunner, Johanna Baehr, Georg Sigl
The safety, security, and reliability of microelectronic systems depend on a trustworthy, secured supply chain and design flow. Globally distributed supply chains or unintentional design weaknesses leave the door open for attacks on the hardware level. These scenarios encompass counterfeiting, hardware trojans, or on-device attacks. For these, hardware reverse engineering (RE) results play a pivotal role. The ongoing publication of new RE-involved attacks motivated the development of the common RE scoring system (CRESS). The system enables a general classification of RE-involved scenarios for a common, consistent rating. In this work, the originally qualitative system is extended to a quantitative system. We performed an extensive interview study with experts in the field. The interview results allowed us to derive weights that measure the severity of different RE-involved attack categories. The weights form an equation that quantifies scenarios, resulting in the severity-indicating CRESS score. The score enables the coherent rating of novel scenarios, renders them comparable, and supports the development of effective countermeasures. To showcase the effectiveness of the quantitative CRESS Score, six selected case studies are rated qualitatively and quantitatively. The CRESS Score proves to be significantly more expressive than the industry-standard Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.05459 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.05459v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05459
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Alexander Hepp [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 21:34:57 UTC (535 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)