CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 04, 2026

Simulate, Reason, Decide: Scientific Reasoning with LLMs for Simulation-Driven Decision Making

arXiv AI Archived Jun 04, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.04505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific simulators are increasingly being integrated into LLM-driven systems for high-stakes simulation-driven decision-making. However, existing frameworks primarily use LLMs to generate, calibrate, or execute simulators, treating them as black-box interfaces rather than as structured mechanistic systems that can be reasoned about. As a result, current approaches lack the ability to identify, represent, and reason about the assumptions and mech

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 3 Jun 2026] Simulate, Reason, Decide: Scientific Reasoning with LLMs for Simulation-Driven Decision Making Yuhan Yang, Ruipu Li, Alexander Rodríguez Scientific simulators are increasingly being integrated into LLM-driven systems for high-stakes simulation-driven decision-making. However, existing frameworks primarily use LLMs to generate, calibrate, or execute simulators, treating them as black-box interfaces rather than as structured mechanistic systems that can be reasoned about. As a result, current approaches lack the ability to identify, represent, and reason about the assumptions and mechanisms underlying simulator behavior, limiting transparency, auditability, and decision justification. We introduce MechSim, a mechanism-grounded neuro-symbolic reasoning framework for executable scientific simulators. Unlike prior neuro-symbolic approaches that primarily reason over static symbolic structures, MechSim enables LLM agents to reason about the mechanisms, assumptions, and execution behavior of scientific simulators. Our framework represents simulators through a shared structured schema capturing assumptions, variables, mechanism dependencies, and execution traces. On top of this representation, LLM agents operate as constrained reasoning engines that generate structured, evidence-grounded explanations linking simulator outcomes to their underlying mechanisms. We evaluate our approach across multiple high-stakes domains and show that it improves mechanism-level explanation quality, simulator analysis, and downstream decision-making reliability. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.04505 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.04505v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04505 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yuhan Yang [view email] [v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 06:36:51 UTC (410 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 04, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 04, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗