Simulate, Reason, Decide: Scientific Reasoning with LLMs for Simulation-Driven Decision Making
arXiv AIArchived Jun 04, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.04505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific simulators are increasingly being integrated into LLM-driven systems for high-stakes simulation-driven decision-making. However, existing frameworks primarily use LLMs to generate, calibrate, or execute simulators, treating them as black-box interfaces rather than as structured mechanistic systems that can be reasoned about. As a result, current approaches lack the ability to identify, represent, and reason about the assumptions and mech
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]
Simulate, Reason, Decide: Scientific Reasoning with LLMs for Simulation-Driven Decision Making
Yuhan Yang, Ruipu Li, Alexander Rodríguez
Scientific simulators are increasingly being integrated into LLM-driven systems for high-stakes simulation-driven decision-making. However, existing frameworks primarily use LLMs to generate, calibrate, or execute simulators, treating them as black-box interfaces rather than as structured mechanistic systems that can be reasoned about. As a result, current approaches lack the ability to identify, represent, and reason about the assumptions and mechanisms underlying simulator behavior, limiting transparency, auditability, and decision justification. We introduce MechSim, a mechanism-grounded neuro-symbolic reasoning framework for executable scientific simulators. Unlike prior neuro-symbolic approaches that primarily reason over static symbolic structures, MechSim enables LLM agents to reason about the mechanisms, assumptions, and execution behavior of scientific simulators. Our framework represents simulators through a shared structured schema capturing assumptions, variables, mechanism dependencies, and execution traces. On top of this representation, LLM agents operate as constrained reasoning engines that generate structured, evidence-grounded explanations linking simulator outcomes to their underlying mechanisms. We evaluate our approach across multiple high-stakes domains and show that it improves mechanism-level explanation quality, simulator analysis, and downstream decision-making reliability.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04505 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.04505v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04505
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yuhan Yang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 06:36:51 UTC (410 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)