CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 04, 2026

The Digital Apprentice: A Framework for Human-Directed Agentic AI Development

arXiv AI Archived Jun 04, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.04321v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI deployments face a recurring design tension: heavy human oversight limits scale, while broad autonomy outruns accountability. Neither posture provides the governance infrastructure required for responsible delegation. We present the Digital Apprentice, a framework for scalable, safe AI agency in which autonomy is earned, not assumed. The Digital Apprentice is a developmental learner that internalizes the tacit methodology of a directing

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 3 Jun 2026] The Digital Apprentice: A Framework for Human-Directed Agentic AI Development Travis Weber, Rohit Taneja Agentic AI deployments face a recurring design tension: heavy human oversight limits scale, while broad autonomy outruns accountability. Neither posture provides the governance infrastructure required for responsible delegation. We present the Digital Apprentice, a framework for scalable, safe AI agency in which autonomy is earned, not assumed. The Digital Apprentice is a developmental learner that internalizes the tacit methodology of a directing human, graduating through per-skill autonomy tiers only when empirical evidence justifies it. The result is an agent that becomes genuinely useful over time while remaining aligned to a specific human's standards. Three architectural components make this possible. (1) Methodology capture, distilling a directing professional's tacit approach into structured assets. (2) Authorization, with autonomy escalation gated by explicit human approval. (3) Continuous alignment, correcting drift at runtime and converting each correction into owned preference data. We instantiate this framework as an inference-time control plane. We mathematically model the quality framework and discuss policies and techniques designed to raise quality. We apply the framework to an open professional corpus, and we show how catching data drift and applying a different technique at runtime recovers degraded quality dimensions under traffic shift. The implication extends beyond any single application. We believe these three pillars, stitched together as a system, form a safer and more viable path to agentic systems that can scale without sacrificing trust. Comments: Submitted to ACM AI Leadership Summit 2026, Visionary Papers Track. 5 pages, 2 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.04321 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.04321v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04321 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Rohit Taneja [view email] [v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 00:49:13 UTC (774 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 04, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 04, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗