CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 04, 2026

StepPRM-RTL: Stepwise Process-Reward Guided LLM Fine-Tuning for Enhanced RTL Synthesis

arXiv AI Archived Jun 04, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.04246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic generation of RTL code for digital hardware designs remains challenging due to long-horizon reasoning, multi-step dependencies, and strict correctness constraints in Verilog and VHDL. We present StepPRM-RTL, a novel framework that combines stepwise trajectory modeling, process-reward modeling (PRM), and retrieval-augmented fine-tuning (RAFT) to enhance both the functional correctness and reasoning fidelity of LLM-based RTL code generation

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 2 Jun 2026] StepPRM-RTL: Stepwise Process-Reward Guided LLM Fine-Tuning for Enhanced RTL Synthesis Prashanth Vijayaraghavan, Apoorva Nitsure, Luyao Shi, Ehsan Degan, Vandana Mukherjee Automatic generation of RTL code for digital hardware designs remains challenging due to long-horizon reasoning, multi-step dependencies, and strict correctness constraints in Verilog and VHDL. We present StepPRM-RTL, a novel framework that combines stepwise trajectory modeling, process-reward modeling (PRM), and retrieval-augmented fine-tuning (RAFT) to enhance both the functional correctness and reasoning fidelity of LLM-based RTL code generation. StepPRM-RTL constructs stepwise reasoning trajectories from canonical solutions, where each step contains a rationale and incremental code modification. A Process Reward Model (PRM) evaluates intermediate steps, providing dense feedback that guides reinforcement-style updates during RAFT fine-tuning. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) explores alternative reasoning paths, enriching the training dataset with high-quality trajectories. This integration of stepwise and outcome-aware rewards allows the model to learn both how and why to construct correct RTL, improving long-horizon reasoning beyond standard supervised or outcome-based training. Experimental evaluation on benchmark Verilog and VHDL datasets demonstrates that StepPRM-RTL outperforms the best prior methods by over 10\% in functional correctness and reasoning fidelity metrics. Ablation studies confirm that the combination of PRM-guided rewards and stepwise trajectory exploration is key to its performance. StepPRM-RTL generalizes across RTL languages and provides a scalable framework for high-fidelity, interpretable code generation, establishing a new standard for LLM-assisted hardware design automation. Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, DAC'2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2606.04246 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.04246v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04246 Focus to learn more Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3770743.3804218 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Prashanth Vijayaraghavan [view email] [v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 21:52:48 UTC (217 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AR cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 04, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 04, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗