CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 04, 2026

VAMPS: Visual-Assisted Mathematical Problem Solving Benchmark

arXiv AI Archived Jun 04, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.04244v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models are increasingly capable of complex reasoning, yet their performance often degrades when they must externalize a problem through a tool and then reason over the tool's output, specifically when they rely on visual aids. This gap is especially important because real engineering and scientific workflows often rely on visualization tools for analysis, validation, and decision-making. To study this discrepancy, we intro

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 2 Jun 2026] VAMPS: Visual-Assisted Mathematical Problem Solving Benchmark Amirhossein Dabiriaghdam, Shayan Vassef, Mohammadreza Bakhtiari, Yasamin Medghalchi, Ilker Hacihaliloglu, Mesrob Ohannessian, Lele Wang, Giuseppe Carenini Multimodal large language models are increasingly capable of complex reasoning, yet their performance often degrades when they must externalize a problem through a tool and then reason over the tool's output, specifically when they rely on visual aids. This gap is especially important because real engineering and scientific workflows often rely on visualization tools for analysis, validation, and decision-making. To study this discrepancy, we introduce VAMPS (Visual-Assisted Mathematical Problem Solving), a benchmark for graph-assisted mathematics. VAMPS contains 1,168 multimodal, bilingual multiple-choice question-answer pairs drawn from Iranian University Entrance Exam algebra and calculus problems and expanded with human-reviewed LLM-generated synthetic variants, all selected so that plotting provides a natural solution strategy by revealing intersections, extrema, asymptotes, etc. Designed for both benchmarking and diagnosis, VAMPS goes beyond prior multimodal benchmarks that primarily evaluate reasoning over fixed visual inputs by testing whether a model can benefit from constructing a useful graph and grounding its answer in the resulting visualization. Overall, we found that across a diverse set of models, direct analytical solving surprisingly outperforms tool-enabled visual solving, even on problems where plotting is a natural strategy. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2606.04244 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.04244v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04244 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Amirhossein Dabiriaghdam [view email] [v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 21:45:21 UTC (2,354 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.CV cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 04, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 04, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗