NLLog: Lightweight, Explainable SOC Anomaly Detection via Log-to-Language Rewriting
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 04, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.04957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: System-generated logs underpin security monitoring, yet their rigid template-based format hinders both automated analysis and human comprehension. We present NLLog (Natural-Language Log), a lightweight pipeline that deterministically rewrites parsed templates into WHO-WHAT-SEVERITY sentences, pools them with term-frequency-inverse-document-frequency weighting, classifies sessions with tree ensembles, and back-projects evidence with TreeSHAP for ana
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]
NLLog: Lightweight, Explainable SOC Anomaly Detection via Log-to-Language Rewriting
Samuel Ndichu, Tao Ban, Seiichi Ozawa, Takeshi Takahashi, Daisuke Inoue
System-generated logs underpin security monitoring, yet their rigid template-based format hinders both automated analysis and human comprehension. We present NLLog (Natural-Language Log), a lightweight pipeline that deterministically rewrites parsed templates into WHO-WHAT-SEVERITY sentences, pools them with term-frequency-inverse-document-frequency weighting, classifies sessions with tree ensembles, and back-projects evidence with TreeSHAP for analyst review. On Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and Blue Gene/L (BGL) corpora, NLLog exceeds two reproduced matched-protocol baselines; across HDFS, BGL, and the AIT Alert Data Set, it sustains low false-positive rates with commodity-hardware latency suitable for security operations center triage. Coverage, sparse-versus-dense, faithfulness, and adversarial ablations show that fallback sufficiency is corpus-dependent, that an enrollment-time coverage check can surface refinement requirements before deployment, and that an auditable deterministic rewrite combined with lightweight dense encoding provides a measurable representation layer for log-anomaly detection and triage.
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, 12 tables; submitted to ACSAC 2026
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: K.6.5; I.2.6; H.3.3
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04957 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.04957v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04957
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: S. Ndichu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 14:45:29 UTC (643 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.IR
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)