CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 03, 2026

Operationalizing Cyber Attack Prediction: A Gap-Prioritized Framework with Dataset and Model Selection Guidelines

arXiv Security Archived Jun 03, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.03386v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While AI and machine learning for cyber attack prediction have advanced, a critical gap persists between theoretical research and practical operational deployment. Building on Ankalaki et al. (2025), this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of 150+ benchmark datasets and 200+ studies to identify and prioritize five implementation hurdles: (1) temporal dataset obsolescence, (2) narrow attack scope, (3) real-time model interpretability, (4) inade

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 2 Jun 2026] Operationalizing Cyber Attack Prediction: A Gap-Prioritized Framework with Dataset and Model Selection Guidelines Aminu Muhammad Auwal While AI and machine learning for cyber attack prediction have advanced, a critical gap persists between theoretical research and practical operational deployment. Building on Ankalaki et al. (2025), this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of 150+ benchmark datasets and 200+ studies to identify and prioritize five implementation hurdles: (1) temporal dataset obsolescence, (2) narrow attack scope, (3) real-time model interpretability, (4) inadequate adversarial robustness, and (5) privacy/ethical concerns. We introduce a novel gap-prioritization framework that evaluates these limitations based on detection impact, implementation cost, and remediation time. Our analysis identifies dataset obsolescence and adversarial robustness as the highest-priority gaps, while highlighting model interpretability as the most cost-effective path for resource-constrained environments. To bridge the research-practice divide, we provide a practical implementation roadmap and a dataset quality assessment framework that classifies 45 benchmarks into production-ready, research-only, and unusable categories. This work translates academic findings into actionable decision-support tools for robust, production-oriented AI-driven cyber defense. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.03386 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.03386v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03386 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Aminu Muhammad Auwal [view email] [v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:29:53 UTC (669 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 03, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 03, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗