CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 03, 2026

Echelon: Auditable Aggregate-Only Language-Model Adaptation Across Privacy Boundaries

arXiv Security Archived Jun 03, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.02958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-organization language-model adaptation increasingly faces hard governance constraints: in many deployments, device-level model state-parameters, activations, optimizer state, and per-device updates-cannot be exported outside an administrative boundary. Existing distributed and federated stacks typically assume cross-site model exchange and then retrofit privacy mechanisms, which complicates compliance and makes auditing brittle. We present Ec

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 1 Jun 2026] Echelon: Auditable Aggregate-Only Language-Model Adaptation Across Privacy Boundaries Hina Dixit, Punit Kumar, Irene Tenison, Nevasini Sasikumar Cross-organization language-model adaptation increasingly faces hard governance constraints: in many deployments, device-level model state-parameters, activations, optimizer state, and per-device updates-cannot be exported outside an administrative boundary. Existing distributed and federated stacks typically assume cross-site model exchange and then retrofit privacy mechanisms, which complicates compliance and makes auditing brittle. We present Echelon, a boundary-first training architecture that enforces device-level model-state non-export as a systems invariant. Devices train locally inside each boundary; the only cross-boundary payloads are securely aggregated boundary-level deltas plus O(1) coordination metadata, exposed through a concrete audit surface. Restricting exchange to aggregates changes the optimization problem: the system must remain stable under WAN delay, heterogeneous participation, churn, and non-IID data even though the global plane never sees per-device updates. Echelon combines buffered semi-asynchronous secure aggregation, staleness-aware weighting, participation windows, proximal local objectives, and a drift-aware outer synchronization controller. In 1B-parameter LoRA adaptation across M= 2 boundaries, a budget-matched contest over three seeds (24.88M tokens) reaches validation loss 3.887 +/-0.010 and is best or tied-best among tuned low-communication baselines under fixed-token, fixed-bytes, fixed-wall-clock, and fixed-sync-count budgets. In OpenWebText stress tests, Echelon sustains 2,139-2,176 tokens/s across evaluated WAN and non-IID treatments, Echelon-DA improves time-to-target under WAN latency relative to a privacy-parityDiLoCo+SA baseline, and quality degrades by at most 2.2% under 200ms emulated latency or severe non-IID partitioning. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.02958 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.02958v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02958 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Hina Dixit [view email] [v1] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 23:28:29 UTC (3,573 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 03, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 03, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗