A New Framework for Cybersecurity Refusals in AI Agents
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 03, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.02644v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic scaffolds have dramatically improved LLM performance on complex, long-horizon tasks, yielding both broad benefits and amplified risks in domains like cybersecurity. Existing benchmarks for AI agents in cybersecurity focus mainly on measuring proficiency--how effectively agents can complete offensive security tasks--but neglect a critical question: when and how should agents refuse harmful requests? We present the first framework for establi
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 31 May 2026]
A New Framework for Cybersecurity Refusals in AI Agents
Eliot Krzysztof Jones, Mateusz Dziemian, Matt Fredrikson, J Zico Kolter
Agentic scaffolds have dramatically improved LLM performance on complex, long-horizon tasks, yielding both broad benefits and amplified risks in domains like cybersecurity. Existing benchmarks for AI agents in cybersecurity focus mainly on measuring proficiency--how effectively agents can complete offensive security tasks--but neglect a critical question: when and how should agents refuse harmful requests? We present the first framework for establishing refusal boundaries in offensive security contexts. Our framework defines (1) principled criteria for when tasks should be refused, (2) categories of tasks that warrant refusal, and (3) evaluation methodology for measuring agent robustness under both benign and adversarial conditions. We apply this framework to assess how current LLM-powered agents adhere to appropriate refusal boundaries across a range of web-based offensive security scenarios, finding that 6 of 8 frontier models tested show near-zero refusal rates, with only 2 models (GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.1 Codex) demonstrating any meaningful refusal behavior.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.02644 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.02644v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02644
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Eliot Jones [view email]
[v1] Sun, 31 May 2026 15:39:39 UTC (578 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)