CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 03, 2026

D-Judge: Disrupting Multi-Turn Jailbreaks using Semantics-Preserving Output Rewriting

arXiv Security Archived Jun 03, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.02640v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn jailbreak attacks pose a growing threat to large language model (LLM) safety because they exploit feedback from auxiliary judge models to iteratively refine prompts toward harmful goals. Existing defenses largely detect or block unsafe content at individual turns or at the final response, leaving the judge-driven refinement loop intact and allowing attackers to extract informative feedback from intermediate interactions. We introduce D-J

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 31 May 2026] D-Judge: Disrupting Multi-Turn Jailbreaks using Semantics-Preserving Output Rewriting Huanli Gong, Zhipeng Wei, Yu Fu, Haz Sameen Shahgir, Ananya Gupta, Yue Dong, N. Benjamin Erichson Multi-turn jailbreak attacks pose a growing threat to large language model (LLM) safety because they exploit feedback from auxiliary judge models to iteratively refine prompts toward harmful goals. Existing defenses largely detect or block unsafe content at individual turns or at the final response, leaving the judge-driven refinement loop intact and allowing attackers to extract informative feedback from intermediate interactions. We introduce D-Judge, a semantics-preserving output rewriting defense that intervenes directly in this loop by rewriting the victim LLM's responses before they are evaluated by the attacker's judge. By misaligning the judge's feedback signal without changing the meaning of the original response, D-Judge derails the attacker's prompt-refinement process, causing subsequent queries to be optimized against a distorted signal of attack progress. To improve D-Judge's ability to produce such rewrites, we construct a dataset of semantically equivalent response pairs that induce different judge-assigned harmfulness scores, and use it for supervised fine-tuning followed by direct preference optimization. Experiments on HarmBench show that D-Judge reduces the success rate of state-of-the-art multi-turn jailbreaks while preserving performance on benign benchmarks. Comments: Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.02640 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.02640v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02640 Focus to learn more Submission history From: N. Benjamin Erichson [view email] [v1] Sun, 31 May 2026 06:40:02 UTC (224 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 03, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 03, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗