D-Judge: Disrupting Multi-Turn Jailbreaks using Semantics-Preserving Output Rewriting
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 03, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.02640v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn jailbreak attacks pose a growing threat to large language model (LLM) safety because they exploit feedback from auxiliary judge models to iteratively refine prompts toward harmful goals. Existing defenses largely detect or block unsafe content at individual turns or at the final response, leaving the judge-driven refinement loop intact and allowing attackers to extract informative feedback from intermediate interactions. We introduce D-J
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 31 May 2026]
D-Judge: Disrupting Multi-Turn Jailbreaks using Semantics-Preserving Output Rewriting
Huanli Gong, Zhipeng Wei, Yu Fu, Haz Sameen Shahgir, Ananya Gupta, Yue Dong, N. Benjamin Erichson
Multi-turn jailbreak attacks pose a growing threat to large language model (LLM) safety because they exploit feedback from auxiliary judge models to iteratively refine prompts toward harmful goals. Existing defenses largely detect or block unsafe content at individual turns or at the final response, leaving the judge-driven refinement loop intact and allowing attackers to extract informative feedback from intermediate interactions. We introduce D-Judge, a semantics-preserving output rewriting defense that intervenes directly in this loop by rewriting the victim LLM's responses before they are evaluated by the attacker's judge. By misaligning the judge's feedback signal without changing the meaning of the original response, D-Judge derails the attacker's prompt-refinement process, causing subsequent queries to be optimized against a distorted signal of attack progress. To improve D-Judge's ability to produce such rewrites, we construct a dataset of semantically equivalent response pairs that induce different judge-assigned harmfulness scores, and use it for supervised fine-tuning followed by direct preference optimization. Experiments on HarmBench show that D-Judge reduces the success rate of state-of-the-art multi-turn jailbreaks while preserving performance on benign benchmarks.
Comments: Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.02640 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.02640v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02640
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: N. Benjamin Erichson [view email]
[v1] Sun, 31 May 2026 06:40:02 UTC (224 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)