CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 01, 2026

MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling

arXiv AI Archived Jun 01, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.30738v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization across agentic tool-calling environments remains a central challenge for reliable agentic reasoning systems. Although large language models achieve strong results on individual benchmarks, their ability to compose reasoning strategies, preserve intermediate states, and coordinate tools across domains remains underexplored. We present MAVEN (Modular Agentic Verification and Execution Network), a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 29 May 2026] MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling Omkar Ghugarkar, Vishvesh Bhat, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Asad Aali Generalization across agentic tool-calling environments remains a central challenge for reliable agentic reasoning systems. Although large language models achieve strong results on individual benchmarks, their ability to compose reasoning strategies, preserve intermediate states, and coordinate tools across domains remains underexplored. We present MAVEN (Modular Agentic Verification and Execution Network), a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold for structured decomposition, adaptive tool orchestration, and intermediate verification. We evaluate MAVEN across established tool-calling benchmarks, including BFCL v3, TauBench, Tau2Bench, AceBench, and introduce MAVEN-Bench, a stress-test benchmark for multi-step mathematical and physical reasoning with explicit verification and adversarial task composition. MAVEN-Bench exposes a substantial gap between partial reasoning quality and end-to-end task success; in direct MAVEN-Bench runs, MAVEN improves its GPT-OSS-120b base model from 48% to 71% accuracy without additional training. It also remains competitive with frontier proprietary baselines while using an open-weight backbone with an estimated cost ratio of roughly 1/10, suggesting that lightweight verification-centered scaffolds can strengthen compositional reasoning and motivate more process-aware evaluation of agents in the wild. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.30738 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.30738v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.30738 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Vishvesh Bhat [view email] [v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 02:02:31 UTC (319 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 01, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 01, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗