MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling
arXiv AIArchived Jun 01, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.30738v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization across agentic tool-calling environments remains a central challenge for reliable agentic reasoning systems. Although large language models achieve strong results on individual benchmarks, their ability to compose reasoning strategies, preserve intermediate states, and coordinate tools across domains remains underexplored. We present MAVEN (Modular Agentic Verification and Execution Network), a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 29 May 2026]
MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling
Omkar Ghugarkar, Vishvesh Bhat, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Asad Aali
Generalization across agentic tool-calling environments remains a central challenge for reliable agentic reasoning systems. Although large language models achieve strong results on individual benchmarks, their ability to compose reasoning strategies, preserve intermediate states, and coordinate tools across domains remains underexplored. We present MAVEN (Modular Agentic Verification and Execution Network), a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold for structured decomposition, adaptive tool orchestration, and intermediate verification. We evaluate MAVEN across established tool-calling benchmarks, including BFCL v3, TauBench, Tau2Bench, AceBench, and introduce MAVEN-Bench, a stress-test benchmark for multi-step mathematical and physical reasoning with explicit verification and adversarial task composition. MAVEN-Bench exposes a substantial gap between partial reasoning quality and end-to-end task success; in direct MAVEN-Bench runs, MAVEN improves its GPT-OSS-120b base model from 48% to 71% accuracy without additional training. It also remains competitive with frontier proprietary baselines while using an open-weight backbone with an estimated cost ratio of roughly 1/10, suggesting that lightweight verification-centered scaffolds can strengthen compositional reasoning and motivate more process-aware evaluation of agents in the wild.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.30738 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.30738v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.30738
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Vishvesh Bhat [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 02:02:31 UTC (319 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)