CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 29, 2026

Bridging the Sim-to-Real Gap in Reinforcement Learning-Based Industrial Dispatching through Execution Semantics

arXiv AI Archived May 29, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.29078v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Event-driven scheduling policies are increasingly deployed in industrial environments, where decisions are made under asynchronous and partially observed system states. As a result, decision states are not temporally consistent, action admissibility is not explicitly defined, and the origin of execution errors remains ambiguous. These issues limit both reliability and interpretability. To address this gap, a policy-neutral execution and measurement

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 27 May 2026] Bridging the Sim-to-Real Gap in Reinforcement Learning-Based Industrial Dispatching through Execution Semantics Jonathan Hoss, Noah Klarmann Event-driven scheduling policies are increasingly deployed in industrial environments, where decisions are made under asynchronous and partially observed system states. As a result, decision states are not temporally consistent, action admissibility is not explicitly defined, and the origin of execution errors remains ambiguous. These issues limit both reliability and interpretability. To address this gap, a policy-neutral execution and measurement layer is proposed to mediate between scheduling policies and the industrial execution environment. The layer constructs decision-valid snapshots from asynchronous event streams, defines a standardized execution contract with explicit action admissibility, and records outcomes as divergences between policy intent, transactional outcomes, physical execution, and human intervention. This enables a separation between decision semantics and execution behavior and makes deployment mismatch observable and structurally attributable. The proposed framework is evaluated using a discrete-event simulation. The results show analytical benefits across all observation lag regimes, as undifferentiated execution failures are transformed into structured, typed outcomes with full attribution coverage. Operational benefits are strongest under low observation lag, where avoidable execution errors can be prevented before commitment. Overall, the layer turns execution uncertainty into supervisory data for evaluation and policy refinement. Comments: Accepted for publication at the 24th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN 2026), held from 26 to 29 July 2026 in Melbourne, Australia Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2605.29078 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.29078v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29078 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jonathan Hoss [view email] [v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 20:30:20 UTC (112 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 29, 2026
    Archived
    May 29, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗