Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning
arXiv AIArchived May 29, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.29068v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Maintaining the safety of large language models (LLMs) is crucial as they are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. Existing safety guardrails typically rely on single-pass classification or, more recently, distilled reasoning. Reasoning-based guardrails significantly outperform classification-only baselines, but they incur substantial query latency and token overhead that make them impractical for highthroughput deployment. To address
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 27 May 2026]
Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning
Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen
Maintaining the safety of large language models (LLMs) is crucial as they are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. Existing safety guardrails typically rely on single-pass classification or, more recently, distilled reasoning. Reasoning-based guardrails significantly outperform classification-only baselines, but they incur substantial query latency and token overhead that make them impractical for highthroughput deployment. To address this challenge, we propose COLAGUARD, a guardrail model that transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space through a stage-wise training curriculum, enabling direct hidden-state propagation at inference. Evaluated on ten prompt- and response-moderation settings spanning eight safety benchmarks, COLAGUARD improves macro-F1 by 8.24 points over Llama Guard 3 and matches our explicit reasoning baseline, GuardReasoner, in macroF1 while delivering a 12.9X speedup and 22.4X reduction in token usage. Our results suggest that latent reasoning offers a practical alternative to explicit rationale generation for deployable guardrails, jointly improving safety robustness and inference efficiency rather than treating them as competing objectives.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.29068 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.29068v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29068
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Muhao Chen [view email]
[v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 20:15:22 UTC (1,882 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.CR
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)