CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 28, 2026

A Fixed-Budget, Cluster-Aware Standard for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation: A Multi-Hop RAG Stress Test

arXiv AI Archived May 28, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.27789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are often compared by asking a large language model (LLM) judge which answer is better. For multi-hop RAG, this has become a measurement problem as much as a modeling problem: the same score can reflect retrieval quality, answer length, lexical overlap, or a statistical test that ignores clustered data. We ask what happens when these choices are made explicit. We propose a minimum measurement standard fo

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 27 May 2026] A Fixed-Budget, Cluster-Aware Standard for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation: A Multi-Hop RAG Stress Test Camilo Chacón Sartori, José H. García Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are often compared by asking a large language model (LLM) judge which answer is better. For multi-hop RAG, this has become a measurement problem as much as a modeling problem: the same score can reflect retrieval quality, answer length, lexical overlap, or a statistical test that ignores clustered data. We ask what happens when these choices are made explicit. We propose a minimum measurement standard for LLM-as-a-judge comparisons in RAG. The standard fixes the top-100 candidate pool, evidence budget, answer cap, generator, and prompt; it also requires pre-registered hypotheses, cluster-aware inference, an exact cluster sign-flip check when feasible, and second-judge replication. Clustered benchmarks can overstate progress; the field should adopt this standard. We stress-test it with Genetic Algorithm Decoder for Multi-hop Evidence Composition (GADMEC), an evolutionary evidence selector, on 400 multi-hop questions in computer science/machine learning (CS/ML) and Materials Science. The protocol changes the empirical story. A binomial test makes all four semantic-baseline comparisons look significant; cluster-aware inference leaves only one Bonferroni-significant result. BM25 beats pure semantic GADMEC under the same budget, while a lexical-semantic hybrid recovers in CS/ML and narrows the Materials Science gap. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2605.27789 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.27789v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27789 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Camilo Chacón Sartori [view email] [v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 00:12:02 UTC (383 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 28, 2026
    Archived
    May 28, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗