CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 28, 2026

Do you dare to try Test-Driven Forensics? Increasing Trust in Desktop Forensics with ADARE

arXiv Security Archived May 28, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.28476v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Digital forensic relies on validated tools and established procedures, yet the underlying operating systems, applications, and analysis tools evolve rapidly. This evolution can cause artifact behavior and tool outputs to drift, silently degrading repeatability and confidence in long-lived forensic interpretations. We present test-driven forensics, a practical approach that treats forensic expectations as executable specifications: expected artifact

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 27 May 2026] Do you dare to try Test-Driven Forensics? Increasing Trust in Desktop Forensics with ADARE Michael Külper, Martin Lambertz, Mariia Rybalka Digital forensic relies on validated tools and established procedures, yet the underlying operating systems, applications, and analysis tools evolve rapidly. This evolution can cause artifact behavior and tool outputs to drift, silently degrading repeatability and confidence in long-lived forensic interpretations. We present test-driven forensics, a practical approach that treats forensic expectations as executable specifications: expected artifacts and expected tool outputs are encoded as tests that can be rerun across versions to detect regressions. Crucially, our approach also enables State Transition Testing, validating the system's expected state after each user action rather than only performing post-mortem checks on a final disk image; this supports causal attribution and makes transient behavior testable. We implement the methodology in ADARE, an open-source framework that runs controlled experiments in virtual machines and simulates realistic user activity via computer-vision-guided GUI automation. ADARE includes a companion web platform for sharing experiments, environments, and results to facilitate independent reruns and peer verification. We evaluate ADARE in five case studies spanning artifact research and tool validation. In particular, a 25-version regression study of Autopsy reveals substantial, largely undocumented changes in exported report outputs, demonstrating how executable tests make drift measurable and reproducible at scale. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) ACM classes: K.6.5; D.2.5 Cite as: arXiv:2605.28476 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2605.28476v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28476 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Michael Külper [view email] [v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 13:38:06 UTC (656 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 28, 2026
    Archived
    May 28, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗