Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions
arXiv SecurityArchived May 28, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.27667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Android's permission system is designed to balance usability with informed consent, yet two legacy mechanisms still undermine that balance in Android 16: (i) permission groups that silently auto-grant new permissions within a group after a user's initial approval, and (ii) normal-level custom permissions that are auto-granted at install and enable cross-app access with no user visibility. We conduct a longitudinal analysis of 19.3 million APKs span
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]
Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions
Olawale Amos Akanji, Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini
Android's permission system is designed to balance usability with informed consent, yet two legacy mechanisms still undermine that balance in Android 16: (i) permission groups that silently auto-grant new permissions within a group after a user's initial approval, and (ii) normal-level custom permissions that are auto-granted at install and enable cross-app access with no user visibility. We conduct a longitudinal analysis of 19.3 million APKs spanning 5.97 million unique apps (distinct package identifiers) from the AndroZoo repository, combined with on-device validation on Android 16. Among 2,244,575 multi-version apps, 381,026 (17%) silently gain permissions within already-granted groups. Using VirusTotal detections with primary threshold t=20, apps flagged as malware expand within groups at a higher rate than benign apps (odds ratio = 1.35, p < 0.001); the association holds across every tested threshold and concentrates in permission-heavy apps (OR = 2.06 in the top quartile). We also identify 307 cross-developer normal-custom-permission pairs that expose contacts, SMS, location, authentication credentials, user identity, and medical records to unrelated apps without any user prompt. A lightweight prototype built on public Android APIs recorded 23 silent expansion events across 13 apps during a 96-day single-device pilot, showing that update-time transparency is reachable without OS modification. Our results show that consent erosion persists despite a decade of platform hardening and affects apps ranging from obscure utilities to widely deployed and pre-installed software.
Comments: 24 pages, 3 figures, 6 tables. To appear in the Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware & Vulnerability Assessment (DIMVA 2026), July 1-3, 2026, Chania, Greece. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
ACM classes: D.4.6; K.6.5
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27667 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.27667v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27667
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Olawale Akanji [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 20:37:23 UTC (394 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)