CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning

MESD: Detecting and Mitigating Procedural Bias in Intersectional Groups

arXiv AI Archived Mar 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.13452v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research about bias in machine learning has mostly focused on outcome-oriented fairness metrics (e.g., equalized odds) and on a single protected category. Although these approaches offer great insight into bias in ML, they provide limited insight into model procedure bias. To address this gap, we proposed multi-category explanation stability disparity (MESD), an intersectional, procedurally oriented metric that measures the disparity in the quality

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 13 Mar 2026] MESD: Detecting and Mitigating Procedural Bias in Intersectional Groups Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard Research about bias in machine learning has mostly focused on outcome-oriented fairness metrics (e.g., equalized odds) and on a single protected category. Although these approaches offer great insight into bias in ML, they provide limited insight into model procedure bias. To address this gap, we proposed multi-category explanation stability disparity (MESD), an intersectional, procedurally oriented metric that measures the disparity in the quality of explanations across intersectional subgroups in multiple protected categories. MESD serves as a complementary metric to outcome-oriented metrics, providing detailed insight into the procedure of a model. To further extend the scope of the holistic selection model, we also propose a multi-objective optimization framework, UEF (Utility-Explanation-Fairness), that jointly optimizes three objectives. Experimental results across multiple datasets show that UEF effectively balances objectives. Also, the results show that MESD can effectively capture the explanation difference between intersectional groups. This research addresses an important gap by examining explainability with respect to fairness across multiple protected categories. Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, submitted to IEEE IJCNN Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2603.13452 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.13452v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13452 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Gideon Popoola [view email] [v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:42:31 UTC (230 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Archived
    Mar 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗