MESD: Detecting and Mitigating Procedural Bias in Intersectional Groups
arXiv AIArchived Mar 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.13452v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research about bias in machine learning has mostly focused on outcome-oriented fairness metrics (e.g., equalized odds) and on a single protected category. Although these approaches offer great insight into bias in ML, they provide limited insight into model procedure bias. To address this gap, we proposed multi-category explanation stability disparity (MESD), an intersectional, procedurally oriented metric that measures the disparity in the quality
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2026]
MESD: Detecting and Mitigating Procedural Bias in Intersectional Groups
Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard
Research about bias in machine learning has mostly focused on outcome-oriented fairness metrics (e.g., equalized odds) and on a single protected category. Although these approaches offer great insight into bias in ML, they provide limited insight into model procedure bias. To address this gap, we proposed multi-category explanation stability disparity (MESD), an intersectional, procedurally oriented metric that measures the disparity in the quality of explanations across intersectional subgroups in multiple protected categories. MESD serves as a complementary metric to outcome-oriented metrics, providing detailed insight into the procedure of a model. To further extend the scope of the holistic selection model, we also propose a multi-objective optimization framework, UEF (Utility-Explanation-Fairness), that jointly optimizes three objectives. Experimental results across multiple datasets show that UEF effectively balances objectives. Also, the results show that MESD can effectively capture the explanation difference between intersectional groups. This research addresses an important gap by examining explainability with respect to fairness across multiple protected categories.
Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, submitted to IEEE IJCNN
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.13452 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.13452v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13452
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Gideon Popoola [view email]
[v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:42:31 UTC (230 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)