CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 27, 2026

Towards Feedback-to-Plan Decisions for Self-Evolving LLM Agents in CUDA Kernel Generation

arXiv AI Archived May 27, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.26720v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong empirical gains as self-evolving agents for CUDA kernel generation, driven by feedback-conditioned planning across generations. However, how planning decisions attribute and combine heterogeneous feedback signals remains opaque. Standard end-to-end ablations fail to resolve this question, as iterative planning amplifies early perturbations and conflates feedback effects with trajectory-dependent drift.

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 26 May 2026] Towards Feedback-to-Plan Decisions for Self-Evolving LLM Agents in CUDA Kernel Generation Yee Hin Chong, Jiaming Wu, Youhui Zhang, Peng Qu Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong empirical gains as self-evolving agents for CUDA kernel generation, driven by feedback-conditioned planning across generations. However, how planning decisions attribute and combine heterogeneous feedback signals remains opaque. Standard end-to-end ablations fail to resolve this question, as iterative planning amplifies early perturbations and conflates feedback effects with trajectory-dependent drift. We introduce \texttt{CUDAnalyst}, a unified analysis layer for controlled, generation-level attribution of planning decisions to feedback components via trajectory freezing and selective feedback injection. \texttt{CUDAnalyst} enables stable generation-level evaluation and principled coalitional-style attribution of feedback effects and interactions. Our results show that explicit planning is beneficial only when feedback is aligned, that effective planning emerges from structured multi-feedback interactions, and that high-level plans from stronger reasoning models can partially transfer to weaker ones. These trends hold across reference backbones, representative workloads, and reference induction regimes, indicating that the identified feedback-to-plan structure is robust within the controlled axes studied. Comments: ICML 2026 accpeted, camera-ready in progress Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.26720 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.26720v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26720 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yee Hin Chong [view email] [v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 09:00:09 UTC (5,089 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 27, 2026
    Archived
    May 27, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗