Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning into Interpretable Fuzzy Rules: An Explainable AI Framework
arXiv AIArchived Mar 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.13257v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents achieve remarkable performance in continuous control but remain opaque, hindering deployment in safety-critical domains. Existing explainability methods either provide only local insights (SHAP, LIME) or employ over-simplified surrogates failing to capture continuous dynamics (decision trees). This work proposes a Hierarchical Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Classifier System (FCS) distilling neural policies
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 24 Feb 2026]
Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning into Interpretable Fuzzy Rules: An Explainable AI Framework
Sanup S. Araballi, Simon Khan, Chilukuri K. Mohan
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents achieve remarkable performance in continuous control but remain opaque, hindering deployment in safety-critical domains. Existing explainability methods either provide only local insights (SHAP, LIME) or employ over-simplified surrogates failing to capture continuous dynamics (decision trees). This work proposes a Hierarchical Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Classifier System (FCS) distilling neural policies into human-readable IF-THEN rules through K-Means clustering for state partitioning and Ridge Regression for local action inference. Three quantifiable metrics are introduced: Fuzzy Rule Activation Density (FRAD) measuring explanation focus, Fuzzy Set Coverage (FSC) validating vocabulary completeness, and Action Space Granularity (ASG) assessing control mode diversity. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) validates temporal behavioral fidelity. Empirical evaluation on \textit{Lunar Lander(Continuous)} shows the Triangular membership function variant achieves 81.48\% \pm 0.43\% fidelity, outperforming Decision Trees by 21 percentage points. The framework exhibits statistically superior interpretability (FRAD = 0.814 vs. 0.723 for Gaussian, p < 0.001) with low MSE (0.0053) and DTW distance (1.05). Extracted rules such as ``IF lander drifting left at high altitude THEN apply upward thrust with rightward correction'' enable human verification, establishing a pathway toward trustworthy autonomous systems.
Comments: Accepted to AAAI 2026 Spring Symposium Series
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.13257 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.13257v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13257
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Sanup Araballi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Feb 2026 23:53:01 UTC (452 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)