CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning

Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning into Interpretable Fuzzy Rules: An Explainable AI Framework

arXiv AI Archived Mar 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.13257v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents achieve remarkable performance in continuous control but remain opaque, hindering deployment in safety-critical domains. Existing explainability methods either provide only local insights (SHAP, LIME) or employ over-simplified surrogates failing to capture continuous dynamics (decision trees). This work proposes a Hierarchical Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Classifier System (FCS) distilling neural policies

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 24 Feb 2026] Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning into Interpretable Fuzzy Rules: An Explainable AI Framework Sanup S. Araballi, Simon Khan, Chilukuri K. Mohan Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents achieve remarkable performance in continuous control but remain opaque, hindering deployment in safety-critical domains. Existing explainability methods either provide only local insights (SHAP, LIME) or employ over-simplified surrogates failing to capture continuous dynamics (decision trees). This work proposes a Hierarchical Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Classifier System (FCS) distilling neural policies into human-readable IF-THEN rules through K-Means clustering for state partitioning and Ridge Regression for local action inference. Three quantifiable metrics are introduced: Fuzzy Rule Activation Density (FRAD) measuring explanation focus, Fuzzy Set Coverage (FSC) validating vocabulary completeness, and Action Space Granularity (ASG) assessing control mode diversity. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) validates temporal behavioral fidelity. Empirical evaluation on \textit{Lunar Lander(Continuous)} shows the Triangular membership function variant achieves 81.48\% \pm 0.43\% fidelity, outperforming Decision Trees by 21 percentage points. The framework exhibits statistically superior interpretability (FRAD = 0.814 vs. 0.723 for Gaussian, p < 0.001) with low MSE (0.0053) and DTW distance (1.05). Extracted rules such as ``IF lander drifting left at high altitude THEN apply upward thrust with rightward correction'' enable human verification, establishing a pathway toward trustworthy autonomous systems. Comments: Accepted to AAAI 2026 Spring Symposium Series Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.13257 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.13257v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13257 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Sanup Araballi [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Feb 2026 23:53:01 UTC (452 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Archived
    Mar 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗