Do Modern Post-Hoc Watermarking Methods Beat Broken-Arrows?
arXiv SecurityArchived May 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.27135v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rapid proliferation of generative models, such as diffusion models, digital watermarking has emerged as a crucial solution for identifying AI-generated images. Modern post-hoc watermarking schemes use neural networks to achieve an extremely low false-alarm rate while remaining robust to common image transformations. However, there is a lack of comparison between these modern methods and classic ones, particularly in real-world scenarios wh
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]
Do Modern Post-Hoc Watermarking Methods Beat Broken-Arrows?
Enoal Gesny, Eva Giboulot
With the rapid proliferation of generative models, such as diffusion models, digital watermarking has emerged as a crucial solution for identifying AI-generated images. Modern post-hoc watermarking schemes use neural networks to achieve an extremely low false-alarm rate while remaining robust to common image transformations. However, there is a lack of comparison between these modern methods and classic ones, particularly in real-world scenarios where robustness and security take precedence over achieving an extremely low false-alarm probability. In this paper, we propose a fair comparison of robustness and security between modern and classic post-hoc watermarking across various types of classic augmentations and recent sophisticated attacks. Our experiments show that, in a realistic scenario, classic watermarking outperforms modern techniques in terms of security while maintaining robustness.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27135 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.27135v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27135
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Enoal Gesny [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 15:04:46 UTC (2,492 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)