Cordyceps: Covert Control Attacks on LLMs via Data Poisoning
arXiv SecurityArchived May 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.26595v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are often fine-tuned on uncurated text datasets that adversaries can poison. Existing poisoning attacks primarily rely on fixed trigger phrases that defenses such as outlier detection, clean-data regularization, or online monitoring can neutralize. In this paper, we propose a data poisoning method that teaches an LLM an information hiding scheme reliably and stealthily through semantic associations between shared knowle
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]
Cordyceps: Covert Control Attacks on LLMs via Data Poisoning
Zedian Shao, Charles Fleming, Teodora Baluta
Large language models (LLMs) are often fine-tuned on uncurated text datasets that adversaries can poison. Existing poisoning attacks primarily rely on fixed trigger phrases that defenses such as outlier detection, clean-data regularization, or online monitoring can neutralize. In this paper, we propose a data poisoning method that teaches an LLM an information hiding scheme reliably and stealthily through semantic associations between shared knowledge such as facts or concepts and attacker-chosen phrases. The induced hiding scheme can encode and decode arbitrary malicious instructions, thus revealing a new and subtle poisoning-induced vulnerability: covert control attacks.
We precisely characterize covert control attacks and evaluate them across 5 LLMs, 3 backdoor defenses, and 4 prompt injection defenses. With a small poisoned fraction, covert control attacks outperform heuristic-based prompt injection attacks in average attack success rate by about 40\% relative to clean fine-tuned models. They also circumvent defenses based on detection and fine-tuning, maintaining up to 93\% attack success rate after backdoor defenses and up to 98\% after prompt injection defenses.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.26595 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.26595v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26595
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zedian Shao [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 06:28:30 UTC (1,906 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)