CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 25, 2026

SPACENUM: Revisiting Spatial Numerical Understanding in VLMs

arXiv AI Archived May 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.23898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in embodied environments, where they need produce numerical outputs such as action magnitudes and spatial coordinates. Although these numbers appear meaningful, it remains unclear whether these numerical outputs are genuinely grounded in spatial perception. Therefore, in this work, we revisit spatial numerical understanding through SpaceNum, a unified framework that captures two complementary

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 22 May 2026] SPACENUM: Revisiting Spatial Numerical Understanding in VLMs Jianshu Zhang, Yijiang Li, Huifeixin Chen, Haoran Lu, Letian Xue, Bingyang Wang, Han Liu Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in embodied environments, where they need produce numerical outputs such as action magnitudes and spatial coordinates. Although these numbers appear meaningful, it remains unclear whether these numerical outputs are genuinely grounded in spatial perception. Therefore, in this work, we revisit spatial numerical understanding through SpaceNum, a unified framework that captures two complementary settings: numbers as dynamic transitions during spatial exploration, and numbers as static layouts in spatial reasoning. We formulate two bidirectional tasks, Num2Space and Space2Num, to evaluate how well VLMs map between vision-side spatial structure and language-side numerical representations. We systematically study whether current VLMs truly understand numerical values in spatial settings. Across dynamic transitions and static layouts, we find that models largely fail to ground numbers in spatial meaning and often perform close to random guess. Through error analysis, reasoning trace analysis, and controlled interventions, we show that current VLMs rely heavily on shallow spatial cues, struggle to build stable coordinate-aware representations, and fail to abstract structured spatial layouts from visual observations. We further show that explicit reasoning provides only marginal gains, while tuning can partially improve spatial numerical understanding and transfer to external spatial reasoning benchmarks. Comments: Project page: this https URL Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.23898 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.23898v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23898 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jianshu Zhang [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 17:58:36 UTC (3,382 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 25, 2026
    Archived
    May 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗