CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 25, 2026

PathCal: State-Aware Reflection-Marker Calibration for Efficient Reasoning

arXiv AI Archived May 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.23074v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The emergence of Large Reasoning Language Models (LRMs) has paved the way for tackling complex reasoning tasks through test-time scaling by generating long-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories during inference. Meanwhile, these trajectories often contain explicit reflection markers such as ``wait'', ``but'', and ``alternatively'', signaling hesitation, revision, and the consideration of alternative explorations, respectively. Recent studies on

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 21 May 2026] PathCal: State-Aware Reflection-Marker Calibration for Efficient Reasoning Lingyu Jiang, Zirui Li, Shuo Xing, Peiran Li, Tsubasa Takahashi, Dengzhe Hou, Zhengzhong Tu, Kazunori Yamada, Fangzhou Lin The emergence of Large Reasoning Language Models (LRMs) has paved the way for tackling complex reasoning tasks through test-time scaling by generating long-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories during inference. Meanwhile, these trajectories often contain explicit reflection markers such as ``wait'', ``but'', and ``alternatively'', signaling hesitation, revision, and the consideration of alternative explorations, respectively. Recent studies on test-time control leverage such markers as lightweight handles for steering reasoning, typically treating them as a single coarse-grained category rather than distinguishing their distinct functional roles. In this paper, we conduct type-wise suppression and fixed-prefix intervention, revealing that reflection markers differ not only in their functional roles but also in when they exert the greatest influence. Specifically, different marker classes affect accuracy and generation length in distinct ways, and marker choices are most consequential before the model settles into a stable reasoning trajectory. Motivated by these findings, we introduce PathCal, a novel training-free decoding controller that calibrates reasoning paths by distinguishing marker types and intervening only at locally uncertain states. At each decoding step, PathCal utilizes the distribution over reflection-markers to estimate local competition between maintaining the current reasoning trajectory and initiating a competing branch, and softly rebalances marker logits when competing-branch evidence becomes excessive. Experiments across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PathCal achieves a better efficiency--performance trade-off, improving or preserving accuracy while reducing generation length, without relying on external verifiers or additional sampling. Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures, 7 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.23074 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.23074v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23074 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Fangzhou Lin [view email] [v1] Thu, 21 May 2026 22:13:20 UTC (304 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 25, 2026
    Archived
    May 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗