Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Type-1 Foundations to Type-2, Type-3 and Quantum Extensions
arXiv AIArchived May 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.22900v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mediative Fuzzy Logic was conceived as a practical scheme for reconciling hesitant or conflicting assessments in fuzzy control and decision-making. However, its logical and semantic foundations remain underdeveloped, especially beyond operational type-1 settings. This article develops a unified account of the type-1 core together with interval type-2, granular type-3, and quantum extensions. We characterize the mediative operator as a convex aggreg
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 21 May 2026]
Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Type-1 Foundations to Type-2, Type-3 and Quantum Extensions
Oscar Montiel Ross
Mediative Fuzzy Logic was conceived as a practical scheme for reconciling hesitant or conflicting assessments in fuzzy control and decision-making. However, its logical and semantic foundations remain underdeveloped, especially beyond operational type-1 settings. This article develops a unified account of the type-1 core together with interval type-2, granular type-3, and quantum extensions. We characterize the mediative operator as a convex aggregation controlled by hesitation and contradiction, model mediative truth values as independent truth-falsity pairs in a continuous bilattice-like structure, and introduce a propositional system extending a standard t-norm-based fuzzy logic with a mediative connective. We establish soundness, paraconsistency, and conservativity over the underlying fuzzy base for formulas without mediation, and formulate coherent semantic extensions to interval type-2 truth values, granule-indexed local evaluations, and effects and density operators on Hilbert spaces. An autonomous-braking sensor-fusion example illustrates how the framework supports transparent, conservative, and safety-first decisions under incomplete, heterogeneous, and mildly contradictory evidence. Under suitable assumptions, the higher-level formulations reduce to the type-1 case, clarifying coherence across levels and reliably supporting future work in intelligent decision systems.
Comments: 30 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.22900 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.22900v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22900
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Oscar Humberto Montiel [view email]
[v1] Thu, 21 May 2026 17:26:53 UTC (53 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LO
quant-ph
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)