CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 25, 2026

NeuroNL2LTL: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Natural Language Translation of Linear Temporal Logic

arXiv AI Archived May 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.22874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effectively translating between natural language (NL) and formal logics like Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) requires expertise that limits formal verification's reach in safety-critical development. Template-based approaches sacrifice expressiveness for reliability; neural methods achieve fluency but provide no correctness guarantees. We present NeuroNL2LTL, a neurosymbolic architecture unifying learned translation with formal verification. NeuroNL2LT

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 20 May 2026] NeuroNL2LTL: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Natural Language Translation of Linear Temporal Logic Paapa Kwesi Quansah, Ernest Bonnah Effectively translating between natural language (NL) and formal logics like Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) requires expertise that limits formal verification's reach in safety-critical development. Template-based approaches sacrifice expressiveness for reliability; neural methods achieve fluency but provide no correctness guarantees. We present NeuroNL2LTL, a neurosymbolic architecture unifying learned translation with formal verification. NeuroNL2LTL routes translation through an intermediate representation whose mapping to LTL is structure-preserving by construction. Generated specifications undergo satisfiability and non-triviality checking; a minimal-edit repair mechanism corrects near-miss outputs before they reach downstream tools. The central innovation is verifier-in-the-loop training: verification outcomes serve as reward signals for reinforcement learning, producing neural components that optimize directly for formal correctness. On 200,000+ requirements spanning aerospace, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and ten additional domains, NeuroNL2LTL achieves 28\% semantic equivalence with reference specifications while ensuring 86\% of outputs are verified satisfiable. The system also generates contextually grounded explanations from LTL, enabling domain experts to validate specifications without specialized training. This work demonstrates that formal verification can function as both training objective and runtime filter for neural specification systems, allowing us to build neural-based tools whose reliability derives from logical guarantees rather than statistical confidence. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO) Cite as: arXiv:2605.22874 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.22874v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22874 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Ernest Bonnah [view email] [v1] Wed, 20 May 2026 03:31:51 UTC (38 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.LO References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 25, 2026
    Archived
    May 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗