Validating Threat Modeling Results with the Help of Vulnerable Test Applications
arXiv SecurityArchived May 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.23695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Validating threat modeling results remains difficult because completeness is hard to judge without an external oracle. Existing studies often rely on expert-produced reference models and other human baselines, but these can contain omissions or disagreements. This paper evaluates a complementary, vulnerability-grounded validation approach. We apply threat modeling to intentionally vulnerable applications with a known vulnerability set to measure th
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 22 May 2026]
Validating Threat Modeling Results with the Help of Vulnerable Test Applications
Oleksandr Adamov, Davide Fucci, Felix Viktor Jedrzejewski, Ricardo Britto, Nishrith Saini
Validating threat modeling results remains difficult because completeness is hard to judge without an external oracle. Existing studies often rely on expert-produced reference models and other human baselines, but these can contain omissions or disagreements. This paper evaluates a complementary, vulnerability-grounded validation approach. We apply threat modeling to intentionally vulnerable applications with a known vulnerability set to measure the number of related vulnerabilities that can be discovered. We compare ThreMoLIA, an LLM-assisted threat modeling solution developed by our team, with the Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool (MTMT) across two vulnerable applications: AzureGoat and the Vulnerable Bank Application (VulnBank). The inputs to both tools are limited to architecture, data flow diagrams, and their descriptions. The results show that ThreMoLIA achieved higher vulnerability coverage on both systems. We show that vulnerable test applications provide a practical benchmark for assessing threat coverage and complement expert-based validation.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.23695 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.23695v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23695
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Oleksandr Adamov [view email]
[v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 14:50:33 UTC (34 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)