CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 25, 2026

Adversarial Vulnerability Under Temporal Concept Drift: A Longitudinal Study of Android Malware Detection

arXiv Security Archived May 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.23623v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a longitudinal, drift-aware evaluation of adversarial robustness across more than a decade of Android applications using static and dynamic feature representations extracted from emulator and real-device executions. The dataset is organized into yearly slices and evaluated under three deployment protocols that emulate realistic learning scenarios: (1) same-year training and testing, (2) cross-year deployment without model updates, and (3

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 22 May 2026] Adversarial Vulnerability Under Temporal Concept Drift: A Longitudinal Study of Android Malware Detection Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammed Kharma, Radi Jarrar, Samer Zein, David Mohaisen We present a longitudinal, drift-aware evaluation of adversarial robustness across more than a decade of Android applications using static and dynamic feature representations extracted from emulator and real-device executions. The dataset is organized into yearly slices and evaluated under three deployment protocols that emulate realistic learning scenarios: (1) same-year training and testing, (2) cross-year deployment without model updates, and (3) expanding-window retraining with cumulative historical data. Across multiple classifier families, adversarial examples are generated using FGSM and SPSA under feasibility constraints. We measure clean performance, Adversarial Accuracy (AA), Attack Success Rate (ASR), and introduce temporal linkage metrics -- RobustDrop, \DeltaASR, and Adversarial Amplification Factor (AAF) -- to quantify the relationship between distribution shift and robustness this http URL show that temporal separation is associated with reduced adversarial robustness under the evaluated transfer-based feature-space setting. As the train-test gap increases, clean accuracy and adversarial accuracy decline, while attack success exhibits configuration-dependent increases, particularly under FGSM perturbations and static features. Expanding-window retraining mitigates, but does not eliminate, robustness loss under continued distributional evolution. These findings indicate that temporal drift should be considered when assessing the long-term robustness of intelligent detection systems under evolving data distributions and highlight the need for drift-aware robustness assessment frameworks in long-lived adversarial environments. Comments: 42 pages, 4 tables, 10 figures Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2605.23623 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2605.23623v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23623 Focus to learn more Submission history From: David Mohaisen [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 13:29:45 UTC (1,128 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 25, 2026
    Archived
    May 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗