arXiv SecurityArchived May 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.23330v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper systematically investigates the security, privacy, and ethical risks, as well as the traceability challenges of OpenClaw, a locally executable AI agent system for natural language interaction and real-world task completion. While OpenClaw shows strong potential for personal assistance, office automation, cross-platform task management, and information integration, it also raises serious security, privacy, and ethical concerns. By analyzi
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 22 May 2026]
Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks in OpenClaw
Yutong Jin, Zelin Zhang, Zhijin Lyu, Jianbing Ni
This paper systematically investigates the security, privacy, and ethical risks, as well as the traceability challenges of OpenClaw, a locally executable AI agent system for natural language interaction and real-world task completion. While OpenClaw shows strong potential for personal assistance, office automation, cross-platform task management, and information integration, it also raises serious security, privacy, and ethical concerns. By analyzing its system architecture, core functionalities, deployment model, and representative application scenarios, this paper aims to reveal the risks that may arise when such a highly privileged agent is integrated into personal and organizational digital environments. We focus in particular on the challenges associated with persistent local storage, tool invocation, cross-context information aggregation, multi-user interaction, and the integration of plugins and external services. We argue that these issues constitute major barriers to the trustworthy deployment and widespread adoption of this technology. Finally, we summarize the open challenges in security defenses, privacy protection, ethical governance, and traceability in agent use, and call for joint efforts from researchers, developers, deployers, and regulators to build AI agent systems that are safer, more reliable, and more trustworthy.
Comments: Accepted by Journal of Information and Intelligence(JII)
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.23330 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.23330v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23330
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yutong Jin [view email]
[v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 07:45:04 UTC (2,417 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)