CCLab: Adversarial Testing of Learning- and Non-Learning-Based Congestion Controllers
arXiv SecurityArchived May 22, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.21915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Congestion controllers (CCs) are critical to network performance, and yet their robustness under adverse conditions remains insufficiently understood. While recent learning-based CCs have demonstrated strong performance in controlled environments, it is unclear how they compare to traditional CCs when controllers' input signals are corrupted or when environmental conditions become systematically challenging. In this paper, we introduce CCLab, an ad
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 21 May 2026]
CCLab: Adversarial Testing of Learning- and Non-Learning-Based Congestion Controllers
Zhi Chen, Shehab Sarar Ahmed, Chenkai Wang, Brighten Godfrey, Gang Wang
Congestion controllers (CCs) are critical to network performance, and yet their robustness under adverse conditions remains insufficiently understood. While recent learning-based CCs have demonstrated strong performance in controlled environments, it is unclear how they compare to traditional CCs when controllers' input signals are corrupted or when environmental conditions become systematically challenging. In this paper, we introduce CCLab, an adversarial testing framework for systematically evaluating the robustness of both learning-based and non-learning-based CCs. CCLab includes a reinforcement learning (RL)-based adversarial agent that operates in a closed loop with the congestion control policy, generating bounded perturbations either on input signals (feature-level) or on external network conditions (environment-level), while preserving realism through explicit constraints. Using this framework, we compare learning-based CCs with non-learning-based CCs under both feature-level and environment-level adversarial conditions. While both types of CCs suffer from performance degradation under adversarial testing, we find that learning-based CCs, in general, are more robust than traditional human-designed algorithms. Finally, we show that our adversarial traces can be used to train more robust CCs that outperform existing learning-based CCs under both challenging and normal conditions.
Comments: 13 pages for main paper, 16 pages in total
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.21915 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.21915v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21915
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhi Chen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 21 May 2026 02:38:08 UTC (1,370 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)