SMA-DP: Spectral Memory-Aware Differential Privacy for Deep Learning
arXiv SecurityArchived May 21, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.20450v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) enables private deep learning through per-example clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise, but its high-variance updates can reduce utility on challenging datasets. We propose \textbf{SMA-DP-SGD}, a \textbf{Spectral Memory-Aware Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent} method that augments DP-SGD with a fractional memory branch built only from previously privatized noisy releas
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 19 May 2026]
SMA-DP: Spectral Memory-Aware Differential Privacy for Deep Learning
Mohammad Partohaghighi, Roummel Marcia
Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) enables private deep learning through per-example clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise, but its high-variance updates can reduce utility on challenging datasets. We propose \textbf{SMA-DP-SGD}, a \textbf{Spectral Memory-Aware Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent} method that augments DP-SGD with a fractional memory branch built only from previously privatized noisy releases. WeightWatcher-inspired power-law spectral exponents provide group-wise reliability signals, instantiated layer-wise in our experiments, to adapt the decay and effective memory depth. Private-history alignment, norm matching, and warm-up activation stabilize the memory contribution. Privacy remains transparent: conditioned on the private release history, the memory branch is fixed, and the only newly data-dependent term is the current clipped sum scaled by a fixed coefficient \(\beta\). Hence, SMA-DP-SGD preserves a clean conditional sensitivity structure and exactly recovers group-wise DP-SGD when \(\beta=1\). Experiments on CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10, and MNIST show competitive or superior accuracy over several DP optimization baselines, with the largest gains on CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10. CIFAR-10 ablations show that \(\beta\) controls the privacy--utility trajectory, while spectral and memory diagnostics confirm a controlled short-to-moderate effective memory depth and a small memory-branch ratio. Runtime analysis shows that the mechanism incurs additional overhead, about \(2.94\times\) DP-SGD in our CIFAR-10 implementation, revealing a practical trade-off between adaptive private memory and computational cost.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.20450 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.20450v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20450
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Mohammad Partohaghighi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 20:02:19 UTC (4,689 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)