CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 21, 2026

It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs

arXiv Security Archived May 21, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.20258v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contextual Integrity (CI) defines privacy not merely as keeping information hidden, but as governing information flows according to the norms of a given context. As large language models are increasingly deployed as personal agents handling sensitive workflows, adhering to CI becomes critical. However, even frontier models remain unreliable in making disclosure decisions, and existing mitigation strategies often degrade underlying task performanc

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Machine Learning [Submitted on 18 May 2026] It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs Sangwoo Park, Woongyeong Yeo, Seanie Lee, Yumin Choi, Hyomin Lee, Kangsan Kim, Jinheon Baek, Seong Joon Oh, Sung Ju Hwang Contextual Integrity (CI) defines privacy not merely as keeping information hidden, but as governing information flows according to the norms of a given context. As large language models are increasingly deployed as personal agents handling sensitive workflows, adhering to CI becomes critical. However, even frontier models remain unreliable in making disclosure decisions, and existing mitigation strategies often degrade underlying task performance. To overcome this privacy-utility trade-off, we propose SELFCI, a complementary self-distillation framework that decouples information suppression from task resolution. SELFCI jointly optimizes two independent reverse KL divergences over distinct teacher distributions derived from feedback: one encourages preserving task-relevant information for utility, while the other enforces minimal and appropriate disclosure. This complementary formulation induces a Product-of-Experts (PoE) target, aligning the policy with the intersection of capability and privacy requirements. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that SELFCI, without relying on costly external supervision, consistently outperforms competitive baselines such as online reinforcement learning algorithms (e.g., GRPO). These trends further extend to out-of-domain settings involving agentic workflows and accumulated private context, suggesting that SELFCI provides a practical path toward CI alignment. Comments: 28 pages, 16 figures Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2605.20258 [cs.LG]   (or arXiv:2605.20258v1 [cs.LG] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20258 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Sangwoo Park [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 13:57:44 UTC (412 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 21, 2026
    Archived
    May 21, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗