Latent Geometry as a Structural Monitor: Eigenspace Alignment for Anomaly Detection in Anonymity Networks
arXiv SecurityArchived May 21, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.20391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditional anomaly detection marks events when measured signals cross predefined thresholds. This captures the moment of transition but not the structural pressure that precedes it. We propose treating large behavioral populations as geometric energy landscapes whose deformation can be measured before and during major transitions. The central thesis is that structure precedes geometry: the structural organization of the population is the signal, a
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 19 May 2026]
Latent Geometry as a Structural Monitor: Eigenspace Alignment for Anomaly Detection in Anonymity Networks
Vaibhav Chhabra
Traditional anomaly detection marks events when measured signals cross predefined thresholds. This captures the moment of transition but not the structural pressure that precedes it. We propose treating large behavioral populations as geometric energy landscapes whose deformation can be measured before and during major transitions. The central thesis is that structure precedes geometry: the structural organization of the population is the signal, and geometric metrics are instruments for measuring it. Applied to the Tor anonymity network across 67 consecutive daily observation windows, the dual-observer pipeline identifies a stable nine-dimensional load-bearing subspace invariant across the observation period and validates this structure by Monte Carlo simulation at 16.8 sigma above the noise floor. Primary detection gates achieve 0.0% false positive rate on 24 confirmed stable windows. Forensic analysis of the February 20, 2026 confirmed infrastructure event formally falsifies the relay-departure hypothesis, identifying connectivity degradation without topology change as a detectable network failure mode. The result is a candidate structural-monitoring framework for behavioral populations with sufficient telemetry.
Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.20391 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.20391v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20391
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Vaibhav Chhabra [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 18:40:24 UTC (869 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)