CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 12, 2026

Coding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know It

Simon Willison Archived Mar 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

Coding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know It Epic piece on AI-assisted development by Clive Thompson for the New York Times Magazine, who spoke to more than 70 software developers from companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, plus other individuals including Anil Dash, Thomas Ptacek, Steve Yegge, and myself. I think the piece accurately and clearly captures what's going on in our industry right now in terms appropriate for a wider audience. I talked to Clive a few w

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Simon Willison’s Weblog Subscribe Sponsored by: CodeRabbit — Planner helps 10x your coding agents while minimizing rework and AI slop. Try Now. Coding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know It. Epic piece on AI-assisted development by Clive Thompson for the New York Times Magazine, who spoke to more than 70 software developers from companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, plus other individuals including Anil Dash, Thomas Ptacek, Steve Yegge, and myself. I think the piece accurately and clearly captures what's going on in our industry right now in terms appropriate for a wider audience. I talked to Clive a few weeks ago. Here's the quote from me that made it into the piece. Given A.I.’s penchant to hallucinate, it might seem reckless to let agents push code out into the real world. But software developers point out that coding has a unique quality: They can tether their A.I.s to reality, because they can demand the agents test the code to see if it runs correctly. “I feel like programmers have it easy,” says Simon Willison, a tech entrepreneur and an influential blogger about how to code using A.I. “If you’re a lawyer, you’re screwed, right?” There’s no way to automatically check a legal brief written by A.I. for hallucinations — other than face total humiliation in court. The piece does raise the question of what this means for the future of our chosen line of work, but the general attitude from the developers interviewed was optimistic - there's even a mention of the possibility that the Jevons paradox might increase demand overall. One critical voice came from an Apple engineer: A few programmers did say that they lamented the demise of hand-crafting their work. “I believe that it can be fun and fulfilling and engaging, and having the computer do it for you strips you of that,” one Apple engineer told me. (He asked to remain unnamed so he wouldn’t get in trouble for criticizing Apple’s embrace of A.I.) That request to remain anonymous is a sharp reminder that corporate dynamics may be suppressing an unknown number of voices on this topic. Posted 12th March 2026 at 7:23 pm Recent articles My fireside chat about agentic engineering at the Pragmatic Summit - 14th March 2026 Perhaps not Boring Technology after all - 9th March 2026 Can coding agents relicense open source through a “clean room” implementation of code? - 5th March 2026 This is a link post by Simon Willison, posted on 12th March 2026. new-york-times 30 careers 71 ai 1913 generative-ai 1696 llms 1662 ai-assisted-programming 364 press-quotes 23 deep-blue 7 Monthly briefing Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments. Pay me to send you less! Sponsor & subscribe Disclosures Colophon © 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    Simon Willison
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 12, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗