CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 20, 2026

Discoverable Agent Knowledge -- A Formal Framework for Agentic KG Affordances (Extended Version)

arXiv AI Archived May 20, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.19186v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Two decades ago, the Semantic Web Services community was asked how agents with different ontological commitments could discover, compose, and invoke web services coherently. The response was OWL-S and WSMO: formally grounded capability descriptions specifying what a service could do, what the agent must already know for invocation to be epistemically sound, and how ontological mismatches could be formally bridged. Current Knowledge Graph (KG) metad

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 18 May 2026] Discoverable Agent Knowledge -- A Formal Framework for Agentic KG Affordances (Extended Version) Terry R. Payne, Valentina Tamma, Enrico Daga Two decades ago, the Semantic Web Services community was asked how agents with different ontological commitments could discover, compose, and invoke web services coherently. The response was OWL-S and WSMO: formally grounded capability descriptions specifying what a service could do, what the agent must already know for invocation to be epistemically sound, and how ontological mismatches could be formally bridged. Current Knowledge Graph (KG) metadata standards such as VoID and DCAT describe what a KG contains yet say nothing about what a specific agent can prove from it, what closure assumptions govern empty results, or whether the agent's task vocabulary is grounded in the schema. Furthermore, in deployed KGs the governing schema DL and the operative entailment regime can diverge: an epistemic failure mode invisible to current metadata. We revisit and extend these insights for the KG setting with a four-dimensional formal framework from which we derive the Agentic Affordance Profile (AAP): a semantic layer above VoID and DCAT enabling principled KG selection, composition, and failure diagnosis at agent planning time. A five-point research agenda identifies the formal, computational, and engineering work needed to realise AAP-based affordance matching at scale. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.19186 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.19186v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19186 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Terry Payne [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 23:26:13 UTC (188 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 20, 2026
    Archived
    May 20, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗