CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 20, 2026

OEP: Poisoning Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Locally Correct but Non-Transferable Experiences

arXiv Security Archived May 20, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.18930v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-augmented large language model (LLM) agents use iterative reflection and self-evolution to solve complex tasks, but these mechanisms introduce security risks. Existing agentic memory attacks require privileged access or explicit malicious content, making them detectable by advanced safety filters. This leaves a subtler attack surface underexplored: whether adversaries can induce agent to generate experiences that appear locally correct and s

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 18 May 2026] OEP: Poisoning Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Locally Correct but Non-Transferable Experiences Kaixiang Wang, Jiong Lou, Zhaojiacheng Zhou, Jie Li Memory-augmented large language model (LLM) agents use iterative reflection and self-evolution to solve complex tasks, but these mechanisms introduce security risks. Existing agentic memory attacks require privileged access or explicit malicious content, making them detectable by advanced safety filters. This leaves a subtler attack surface underexplored: whether adversaries can induce agent to generate experiences that appear locally correct and semantically plausible yet induce harmful generalization during reflection. We find that reflective agents are vulnerable to such clean experiences, especially when paired with severe but plausible hypothetical consequences. Based on this observation, we introduce Obsessive Experience Poisoning (OEP), a low-privilege black-box attack requiring no direct control over the system prompt or memory database. OEP constructs adversarial clean edge-cases that combine locally correct solutions, non-transferable methods, and severe consequences, biasing reflection toward risk-averse rule formation. During memory consolidation, agents may over-trust self-generated reflections and distill localized experiences into high-priority but over-generalized rules, causing downstream failures. Evaluations across three domains show that OEP achieves ASR above 50\% with GPT-4o agents, and outperforms existing attacks under LLM auditing defense. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2605.18930 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2605.18930v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.18930 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Kaixiang Wang [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 14:08:59 UTC (847 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 20, 2026
    Archived
    May 20, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗