CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 19, 2026

Multi-Paradigm Agent Interaction in Practice:A Systematic Analysis of Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Loop,and Adversarial Evaluation in the buddyMe Framework

arXiv AI Archived May 19, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.16821v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents has produced diverse interaction paradigms, yet few production systems integrate multiple paradigms within a unified architecture. This paper presents a systematic analysis of three principal agent interaction paradigms, including Multi-Agent Orchestration (Generator-Evaluator), ReAct Tool-Use Loops, and Memory-Augmented Interaction, as implemented in buddyMe, an open-source multi-model agent

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 16 May 2026] Multi-Paradigm Agent Interaction in Practice:A Systematic Analysis of Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Loop,and Adversarial Evaluation in the buddyMe Framework Xiaohua Wang, Chao Han, Kai Yu, XiaoLiang Xu, Liang Wang The rapid evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents has produced diverse interaction paradigms, yet few production systems integrate multiple paradigms within a unified architecture. This paper presents a systematic analysis of three principal agent interaction paradigms, including Multi-Agent Orchestration (Generator-Evaluator), ReAct Tool-Use Loops, and Memory-Augmented Interaction, as implemented in buddyMe, an open-source multi-model agent programming framework. We formalize a five-stage processing pipeline: Requirement Pre-Review -> Task Decomposition -> ReAct Execution -> Real-Execution Verification -> Adversarial Evaluation Discussion, and establish a six-dimensional evaluation schema with weighted scoring. Through four empirical case studies drawn from real-world deployment logs covering museum guide generation, scheduled weather tasks, and comprehensive tour planning, we draw three key conclusions. First, Generator-Evaluator pre-review detects requirement omissions in 20 percent of complex tasks, with 80 percent tasks passing initial inspection. Second, the ReAct loop ensures stable subtask execution but leads to around 30 percent redundant tool invocations. Third, adversarial Evaluator-Defender discussions reach consensus within 2-3 rounds for nearly 70 percent of scenarios, functioning mainly for content refinement rather than logical reversal. We additionally provide three Mermaid-based architectural diagrams and conduct cross-paradigm comparisons with CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, MemGPT and A-Mem across six system dimensions. The research outcomes offer practical design guidelines for constructing stable and reliable multi-paradigm agent systems. Comments: 11 pages, 7 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.11; I.2.4; I.2.7 Cite as: arXiv:2605.16821 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.16821v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16821 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Xiaohua Wang [view email] [v1] Sat, 16 May 2026 05:35:50 UTC (158 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 19, 2026
    Archived
    May 19, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗