PRISMat: Policy-Driven, Permutation-Invariant Autoregressive Material Generation
arXiv AIArchived May 19, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.16612v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rapid identification of candidate materials with target properties has become a key task in materials science. Machine learning has emerged as an alternative to physics-based simulation, offering a faster and cheaper way to filter materials based on their stability and other target properties, reducing the number of candidates that reach the costly synthesis stage. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to this role, but these mod
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 15 May 2026]
PRISMat: Policy-Driven, Permutation-Invariant Autoregressive Material Generation
Claire Schlesinger, Circe Hsu, Peter Schindler, Robin Walters
Rapid identification of candidate materials with target properties has become a key task in materials science. Machine learning has emerged as an alternative to physics-based simulation, offering a faster and cheaper way to filter materials based on their stability and other target properties, reducing the number of candidates that reach the costly synthesis stage. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to this role, but these models are parameter-heavy and computationally expensive both during training and at inference time, making them unsuitable for high-throughput tasks. This inefficiency stems from both the large over-parameterization of language models and the difficulty of framing material generation as a sequence learning problem. In this paper, we present PRISMat, a cost-effective, permutation-invariant model, which addresses these limitations. We show that PRISMat, despite taking less time for inference, is able to outperform LLMs in generating crystal slabs conditioned on critical materials' surface properties. In targeted material discovery, we achieve mean absolute errors of 0.188 eV/A^2 and 2.79 eV for cleavage energy and work function tasks, respectively, reducing the error of the next best model by 4\times.
Comments: 10 pages, 8 figures, Under Review at Neurips 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.16612 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.16612v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16612
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Claire Schlesinger [view email]
[v1] Fri, 15 May 2026 20:27:11 UTC (590 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)