CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 18, 2026

PCDM: A Diffusion-Based Data Poisoning Attack Against Federated Learning Systems

arXiv Security Archived May 18, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.16098v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is vulnerable to data poisoning attacks due to its distributed nature. Although recent GAN-based data poisoning methods have indicated the potential of using generative AI to generate seemingly legitimate poisoned data, the inherent consistency of GAN outputs can still reveal a sign of data poisoning. In this paper, we propose a diffusion-based data poisoning framework against FL systems, which leverages a Poisoning-Oriented

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 15 May 2026] PCDM: A Diffusion-Based Data Poisoning Attack Against Federated Learning Systems Wei Sun, Yijun Chen, Bo Gao, Ke Xiong, Yuwei Wang, Pingyi Fan, Khaled Ben Letaief Federated learning (FL) is vulnerable to data poisoning attacks due to its distributed nature. Although recent GAN-based data poisoning methods have indicated the potential of using generative AI to generate seemingly legitimate poisoned data, the inherent consistency of GAN outputs can still reveal a sign of data poisoning. In this paper, we propose a diffusion-based data poisoning framework against FL systems, which leverages a Poisoning-Oriented Conditional Diffusion Model (PCDM) to enable fine-grained control over the local generation of poisoned data while ensuring both attack effectiveness and stealthiness. Our PCDM incorporates an adjustable poisoning vector within the global context to precisely control the generation of poisoned data, with theoretical guarantees on attack performance. Furthermore, it employs a novel jumping diffusion strategy for lightweight and efficient poisoned data generation. We conduct the most systematic and broad experimental evaluation for FL poisoning attacks against various defenses, including advanced Byzantine robust aggregation mechanisms, on four open datasets: MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and a real-world wireless-specific dataset VRAI. Our results demonstrate that PCDM is less likely to exhibit statistical anomalies compared with the state-of-the-art methods while more effectively degrading global FL performance, which poses a significant risk to data security in FL. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC) Cite as: arXiv:2605.16098 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2605.16098v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16098 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Wei Sun [view email] [v1] Fri, 15 May 2026 15:53:34 UTC (3,369 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.DC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 18, 2026
    Archived
    May 18, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗