Autonomous Intelligent Agents for Natural-Language-Driven Web Execution with Integrated Security Assurance
arXiv SecurityArchived May 18, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.15281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern web test suites rot. A UI refactor breaks locators, a timing change causes race conditions, and within weeks developers abandon the suite entirely. This paper presents an AI-driven autonomous testing framework that addresses these failure modes through five integrated strategies - navigation reliability, context-aware selector generation, post-generation validation, smart wait injection, and failure learning - implemented over a containerise
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 14 May 2026]
Autonomous Intelligent Agents for Natural-Language-Driven Web Execution with Integrated Security Assurance
Vinil Pasupuleti, Siva Rama Krishna Varma Bayyavarapu, Shrey Tyagi
Modern web test suites rot. A UI refactor breaks locators, a timing change causes race conditions, and within weeks developers abandon the suite entirely. This paper presents an AI-driven autonomous testing framework that addresses these failure modes through five integrated strategies - navigation reliability, context-aware selector generation, post-generation validation, smart wait injection, and failure learning - implemented over a containerised worker architecture that decouples orchestration from long-running browser execution. Evaluated across four production applications and 176 scenarios, the framework improves script generation success from 55% to 93%, achieves an 8x reduction in navigation failures, eliminates 80% of timing-related race conditions, and reduces test creation time by 75% compared to manual Selenium authoring. The framework extends naturally to security validation: testers describe attack scenarios in plain English - "try accessing another user's invoice" - which the agent converts to OWASP Top 10-aligned browser probes, detecting 85% of authentication bypass vulnerabilities and 95% of input validation flaws with false positive rates below 12%. Natural-language-driven security testing of this kind represents, to our knowledge, a novel contribution to the field.
Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables, IEEE conference format
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.15281 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.15281v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15281
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Vinil Pasupuleti [view email]
[v1] Thu, 14 May 2026 18:00:30 UTC (15 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)