CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◌ Quantum Computing

Adversarial Stress Tests for Quantum Certification

arXiv Quantum Archived Mar 16, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.12622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We develop a practical framework for semi-device-independent (SDI) certification under operational deviations from the ideal protocol model. Apparent violations of classical benchmarks need not signal genuinely non-classical behaviour; they can arise from misalignment between (i) the scoring rule, (ii) the finite-sample statistical bound applied to that score, and (iii) the operational model realised in the experiment, including bias, memory, drift

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Quantum Physics [Submitted on 13 Mar 2026] Adversarial Stress Tests for Quantum Certification Veronica Sanz, Augusto Smerzi We develop a practical framework for semi-device-independent (SDI) certification under operational deviations from the ideal protocol model. Apparent violations of classical benchmarks need not signal genuinely non-classical behaviour; they can arise from misalignment between (i) the scoring rule, (ii) the finite-sample statistical bound applied to that score, and (iii) the operational model realised in the experiment, including bias, memory, drift, and selection effects. We formalise a protocol-agnostic alignment principle based on a martingale-safe lower confidence bound and an operationally consistent effective classical ceiling. This yields a quantitative diagnostic, the \emph{robustness gap} \Delta_{\mathrm{rob}} = S_{\mathrm{low}} - S_{C,\mathrm{eff}}, which separates statistical fluctuations from structural modelling errors. Statistical deviations vanish asymptotically, whereas model misalignment can produce persistent false certification unless the benchmark is corrected. Using the 2\!\to\!1 random access code as a minimal SDI testbed, we show that postselection can inflate conditional scores, whereas unconditional scoring restores the correct operational meaning of the witness. We further show that adaptive learning-based classical agents do not enlarge the admissible classical set; rather, they recover the effective classical ceiling implied by the operational model. The resulting framework provides a systematic diagnostic for certification in realistic quantum communication and measurement settings with embedded classical control, adaptive processing, and nonideal data acquisition. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2603.12622 [quant-ph]   (or arXiv:2603.12622v1 [quant-ph] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.12622 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Augusto Smerzi [view email] [v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 03:49:58 UTC (246 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: quant-ph < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Quantum
    Category
    ◌ Quantum Computing
    Published
    Archived
    Mar 16, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗