A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology
arXiv AIArchived May 15, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.13850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing frameworks for LLM-based agent architectures describe systems from a single perspective: industry guides (Anthropic, Google, LangChain) focus on execution topology -- how data flows -- while cognitive science surveys focus on cognitive function -- what the agent does. Neither axis alone disambiguates architecturally distinct systems: the same Orchestrator-Workers topology can implement Plan-and-Execute, Hierarchical Delegation, or Adversar
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 16 Mar 2026]
A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology
Jia Huang, Joey Tianyi Zhou
Existing frameworks for LLM-based agent architectures describe systems from a single perspective: industry guides (Anthropic, Google, LangChain) focus on execution topology -- how data flows -- while cognitive science surveys focus on cognitive function -- what the agent does. Neither axis alone disambiguates architecturally distinct systems: the same Orchestrator-Workers topology can implement Plan-and-Execute, Hierarchical Delegation, or Adversarial Verification -- three patterns with fundamentally different failure modes and design trade-offs.
We propose a two-dimensional classification that combines (1) a Cognitive Function axis with seven categories (Context Engineering, Memory, Reasoning, Action, Reflection, Collaboration, Governance) and (2) an Execution Topology axis with six structural archetypes (Chain, Route, Parallel, Orchestrate, Loop, Hierarchy). The resulting 7x6 matrix identifies 27 named patterns, 13 with original names. We demonstrate orthogonality through systematic cross-axis analysis, define eight representative patterns in detail, and validate descriptive coverage across four real-world domains (financial lending, legal due diligence, network operations, healthcare triage). Cross-domain analysis yields five empirical laws of pattern selection governing the relationship between environmental constraints (time pressure, action authority, failure cost asymmetry, volume) and architectural choices. The framework provides a principled, framework-neutral, and model-agnostic vocabulary for AI agent architecture design.
Comments: 10 pages, 6 tables, 27 named patterns
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
ACM classes: I.2.11; D.2.11
Cite as: arXiv:2605.13850 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.13850v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13850
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jia Huang [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 Mar 2026 04:01:01 UTC (14 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.MA
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)