CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 15, 2026

A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology

arXiv AI Archived May 15, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.13850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing frameworks for LLM-based agent architectures describe systems from a single perspective: industry guides (Anthropic, Google, LangChain) focus on execution topology -- how data flows -- while cognitive science surveys focus on cognitive function -- what the agent does. Neither axis alone disambiguates architecturally distinct systems: the same Orchestrator-Workers topology can implement Plan-and-Execute, Hierarchical Delegation, or Adversar

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 16 Mar 2026] A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology Jia Huang, Joey Tianyi Zhou Existing frameworks for LLM-based agent architectures describe systems from a single perspective: industry guides (Anthropic, Google, LangChain) focus on execution topology -- how data flows -- while cognitive science surveys focus on cognitive function -- what the agent does. Neither axis alone disambiguates architecturally distinct systems: the same Orchestrator-Workers topology can implement Plan-and-Execute, Hierarchical Delegation, or Adversarial Verification -- three patterns with fundamentally different failure modes and design trade-offs. We propose a two-dimensional classification that combines (1) a Cognitive Function axis with seven categories (Context Engineering, Memory, Reasoning, Action, Reflection, Collaboration, Governance) and (2) an Execution Topology axis with six structural archetypes (Chain, Route, Parallel, Orchestrate, Loop, Hierarchy). The resulting 7x6 matrix identifies 27 named patterns, 13 with original names. We demonstrate orthogonality through systematic cross-axis analysis, define eight representative patterns in detail, and validate descriptive coverage across four real-world domains (financial lending, legal due diligence, network operations, healthcare triage). Cross-domain analysis yields five empirical laws of pattern selection governing the relationship between environmental constraints (time pressure, action authority, failure cost asymmetry, volume) and architectural choices. The framework provides a principled, framework-neutral, and model-agnostic vocabulary for AI agent architecture design. Comments: 10 pages, 6 tables, 27 named patterns Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Software Engineering (cs.SE) ACM classes: I.2.11; D.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2605.13850 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.13850v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13850 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jia Huang [view email] [v1] Mon, 16 Mar 2026 04:01:01 UTC (14 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.MA cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 15, 2026
    Archived
    May 15, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗