CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 14, 2026

It's not the Language Model, it's the Tool: Deterministic Mediation for Scientific Workflows

arXiv AI Archived May 14, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.13245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models can produce convincing scientific analyses, but repeated generations on the same data do not guarantee the same result. A researcher may regenerate an identical query and receive a different fit, a different peak position or a different analysis procedure, without an obvious way to decide which output to trust. We propose typed mediation, a pattern in which the model orchestrates deterministic tools rather than generating analytical

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 13 May 2026] It's not the Language Model, it's the Tool: Deterministic Mediation for Scientific Workflows Marios Adamidis, Danae Katrisioti, Yannis Tzitzikas, Emmanuel Stratakis Language models can produce convincing scientific analyses, but repeated generations on the same data do not guarantee the same result. A researcher may regenerate an identical query and receive a different fit, a different peak position or a different analysis procedure, without an obvious way to decide which output to trust. We propose typed mediation, a pattern in which the model orchestrates deterministic tools rather than generating analytical code. Each tool encodes one researcher's exact procedure for one instrument, ported through structured interviews. The model selects which tool to call and with what parameters. The tool produces the result. Regeneration does not change it. We evaluate this claim by running the same photoluminescence analysis on four platforms, including three commercial foundation models, four times each with the same prompt. The typed tool produces identical results across all runs. The commercial platforms either vary in numerical output and analytical methodology across runs, or fail to produce valid results on the task. We deploy this pattern on two instruments serving users over approximately six months, with very positive user feedback. Both cases are very challenging: they involve proprietary binary formats and per-seat licensed software, which force the tool to remain on local infrastructure alongside the data and the instrument it operates. We argue that deployment topology is not just a preference, but a structural requirement of scientific tool mediation. The result is a practical pattern for deploying language models in scientific workflows where reproducibility is mandatory, reducing analysis time from weeks to minutes while guaranteeing identical outputs across runs. Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures, 2 appendices. Submitted to SETN 2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.1; J.2 Cite as: arXiv:2605.13245 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.13245v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13245 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Marios Adamidis [view email] [v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 09:30:56 UTC (5,774 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 14, 2026
    Archived
    May 14, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗