Retrieval-Augmented Tutoring for Algorithm Tracing and Problem-Solving in AI Education
arXiv AIArchived May 14, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.12988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Students learning algorithms often need support as they interpret traces, debug reasoning errors, and apply procedures across unfamiliar problem instances. In this paper, we present KITE (Knowledge-Informed Tutoring Engine), a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based intelligent tutoring system designed to serve as a classroom teaching assistant for algorithmic reasoning and problem-solving tasks. KITE uses an intent-aware Socratic response strat
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 13 May 2026]
Retrieval-Augmented Tutoring for Algorithm Tracing and Problem-Solving in AI Education
Mragisha Jain, Tirth Bhatt, Griffin Pitts, Aum Pandya, Peter Brusilovsky, Narges Norouzi, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Bita Akram
Students learning algorithms often need support as they interpret traces, debug reasoning errors, and apply procedures across unfamiliar problem instances. In this paper, we present KITE (Knowledge-Informed Tutoring Engine), a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based intelligent tutoring system designed to serve as a classroom teaching assistant for algorithmic reasoning and problem-solving tasks. KITE uses an intent-aware Socratic response strategy to tailor support to different student needs, responding with targeted hints, guiding questions, and progressive scaffolding intended to strengthen students' algorithmic problem-solving ability. To keep responses aligned with course content, KITE uses a multimodal RAG pipeline that retrieves relevant information from course materials. We evaluate KITE using three forms of assessment: RAGAs-based metrics for response grounding and quality, expert evaluation of pedagogical quality, and a simulated student pipeline in which a weaker language model interacts with KITE across two-turn dialogues and produces revised answers after receiving feedback. Results indicate that KITE produces contextually grounded and pedagogically appropriate responses. Further, using simulated students, KITE's feedback helped the student models produce more accurate follow-up responses on procedural and tracing questions, suggesting that its scaffolding can support algorithmic problem-solving. This work contributes a tutoring architecture and an evaluation approach for assessing retrieval-grounded explanations and scaffolded problem-solving feedback.
Comments: Paper accepted to the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2026), co-located with ACL 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.12988 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.12988v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12988
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Griffin Pitts [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 04:37:45 UTC (314 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
cs.IR
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)