CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 14, 2026

Security Incentivization: An Empirical Study of how Micropayments Impact Code Security

arXiv Security Archived May 14, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.13100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Security often receives insufficient developer attention because it does not directly generate visible value, leading to underinvestment in practice. We evaluate a countermeasure by team-level incentives tied to measurable security improvements over time. Our semi-automated mechanism aggregates static analysis findings from Bearer, Detekt, and mobsfscan, computes security issue density, and rewards teams based on the relative improvement ratio acro

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 13 May 2026] Security Incentivization: An Empirical Study of how Micropayments Impact Code Security Stefan Rass, Martin Pinzger, Rainer W. Alexandrowicz, Georg Sengstbratl, Johann Glock, Alexander Lercher, Fabian Oraze, Christoph Wedenig Security often receives insufficient developer attention because it does not directly generate visible value, leading to underinvestment in practice. We evaluate a countermeasure by team-level incentives tied to measurable security improvements over time. Our semi-automated mechanism aggregates static analysis findings from Bearer, Detekt, and mobsfscan, computes security issue density, and rewards teams based on the relative improvement ratio across sprints, enabling repeatable, scriptable reporting at scale. In a controlled course experiment with 84 students across 14 teams, we compared a security-incentivized condition, in which bonus points were linked to security scanner results, against a control condition with an otherwise identical grading scheme. The treatment group achieved significantly lower security issue density overall (beta regression: \beta = -0.396, p = 0.0342), indicating improved measurable security under incentivization. After controlling for platform, we observed a marked front-end/back-end disparity, with back-ends showing fewer issues and higher improvement ratios under incentives, highlighting heterogeneous effects across stack layers. Notably, these gains were not the byproduct of inflated code volume, as lines of code increased similarly across groups over time. The measurement pipeline and toolchain proved feasible for scripting and automation, supporting scalable adoption in practice. Our results suggest that aligning rewards with automated security metrics can measurably improve code security and merit follow-up in professional contexts and longer development lifecycles. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2605.13100 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2605.13100v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13100 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Stefan Rass [view email] [v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 07:12:13 UTC (73 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 14, 2026
    Archived
    May 14, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗