CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning May 12, 2026

The Echo Amplifies the Knowledge: Somatic Marker Analogues in Language Models via Emotion Vector Re-Injection

arXiv AI Archived May 12, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2605.08611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current language model memory systems store what happened but not how it felt. This distinction -- between semantic memory (knowing about a past event) and episodic memory (re-experiencing it) -- was identified by Tulving as the difference between noetic and autonoetic consciousness. Damasio demonstrated that humans with intact knowledge but absent emotional markers exhibit impaired decision-making. We bridge this gap for language models. Using Gem

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 9 May 2026] The Echo Amplifies the Knowledge: Somatic Marker Analogues in Language Models via Emotion Vector Re-Injection Jared Glover Current language model memory systems store what happened but not how it felt. This distinction -- between semantic memory (knowing about a past event) and episodic memory (re-experiencing it) -- was identified by Tulving as the difference between noetic and autonoetic consciousness. Damasio demonstrated that humans with intact knowledge but absent emotional markers exhibit impaired decision-making. We bridge this gap for language models. Using Gemma 3 1B-IT with pretrained Gemma Scope 2 sparse autoencoders, we identify 310 emotion-exclusive features at layer 22 with psychologically valid geometry. We construct distinctive-feature emotion vectors during experience and partially re-inject them during recall, triggered by context similarity at layer 7. We test four conditions paralleling Damasio's framework: A (no memory), B (semantic labels), C (emotion echo), and BC (semantic + echo). For emotional orientation, the echo alone steepens the threat-safety gradient: the regression slope of threat rating on contextual similarity is 0.80 for C vs 0.56 for A (p=0.011, permutation test). For decisions, the echo amplifies knowledge into action: BC=80% good choices vs B=52% (z=+2.60, p<0.01), while the echo alone has no effect (C=22%, n.s.). The echo changes how the model feels independently, but changes what it does only when combined with knowledge -- replicating Damasio's core finding. The echo amplifies knowledge. It does not replace it. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.08611 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2605.08611v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08611 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jared Glover [view email] [v1] Sat, 9 May 2026 02:12:39 UTC (596 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    May 12, 2026
    Archived
    May 12, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗