Human-LLM Dialogue Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care
arXiv AIArchived May 12, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2605.08533v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical decision-making in emergency medicine demands rapid, accurate diagnoses under uncertainty. Despite benchmark progress, evidence for LLMs as interactive aids in live physician workflows remains sparse. MedSyn lets physicians iteratively query an LLM provided with the full clinical record while initially viewing only the chief complaint. Seven physicians (three seniors, four residents) completed baseline and AI-assisted sessions across 52 MI
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 8 May 2026]
Human-LLM Dialogue Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care
Burcu Sayin, Ngoc Vo Hong, Ipek Baris Schlicht, Jacopo Staiano, Pasquale Minervini, Sara Allievi, Nicola Susca, Nicola Osti, Alberto Maino, Vito Racanelli, Andrea Passerini
Clinical decision-making in emergency medicine demands rapid, accurate diagnoses under uncertainty. Despite benchmark progress, evidence for LLMs as interactive aids in live physician workflows remains sparse. MedSyn lets physicians iteratively query an LLM provided with the full clinical record while initially viewing only the chief complaint. Seven physicians (three seniors, four residents) completed baseline and AI-assisted sessions across 52 MIMIC-IV cases stratified by difficulty. Blinded evaluation showed residents' Hard-case correctness rose from 0.589 to 0.734; difficulty-standardised completely-correct rates confirmed a medium effect ({\Delta} = 0.092; p = 0.071; d = 0.47). Automated metrics corroborated these gains: standardised any-match accuracy improved by 0.156 (p < 0.0001), and residents showed the largest F1 gain ({\Delta} = 0.138; p < 0.0001). Dialogue analysis revealed expertise-dependent strategies (seniors asked targeted, hypothesis-driven questions; residents relied on broader queries) and cross-expertise concordance increased ({\Delta} = 0.145; p < 0.0001). Interactive LLM support meaningfully enhances diagnostic reasoning.
Comments: Paper under review
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.08533 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.08533v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08533
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Burcu Sayin Günel [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 22:40:10 UTC (1,666 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)