Beyond Final Answers: CRYSTAL Benchmark for Transparent Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation
arXiv AIArchived Mar 16, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.13099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce **CRYSTAL** (*__C__lear __R__easoning via __Y__ielded __S__teps, __T__raceability and __L__ogic*), a diagnostic benchmark with 6,372 instances that evaluates multimodal reasoning through verifiable intermediate steps. We propose two complementary metrics: *Match F1*, which scores step-level precision and recall via semantic similarity matching, and *Ordered Match F1*, which further penalizes disordered reasoning chains. References are
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2026]
Beyond Final Answers: CRYSTAL Benchmark for Transparent Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation
Wayner Barrios, SouYoung Jin
We introduce **CRYSTAL** (*__C__lear __R__easoning via __Y__ielded __S__teps, __T__raceability and __L__ogic*), a diagnostic benchmark with 6,372 instances that evaluates multimodal reasoning through verifiable intermediate steps. We propose two complementary metrics: *Match F1*, which scores step-level precision and recall via semantic similarity matching, and *Ordered Match F1*, which further penalizes disordered reasoning chains. References are constructed through a Delphi-inspired pipeline where four independent MLLMs generate trajectories, aggregated via semantic clustering and validated through human quality gates. Evaluation of 20 MLLMs, including commercial frontier systems not used during benchmark construction, reveals systematic failures invisible to accuracy: universal cherry-picking (precision far exceeds recall), non-monotonic scaling trade-offs, and disordered reasoning where no competitive model preserves more than 60% of matched steps in correct order. Beyond evaluation, we propose the **Causal Process Reward (CPR)**, a multiplicative reward that couples answer correctness with step-level alignment, and **CPR-Curriculum**, which progressively increases reasoning difficulty during training. CPR-Curriculum achieves +32% Match F1 via GRPO where additive reward strategies fail, improving reasoning without manual step annotation.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Multimedia (cs.MM)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.13099 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.13099v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13099
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Wayner Barrios [view email]
[v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:48:15 UTC (3,444 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
cs.IR
cs.MM
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)