An Artifact-based Agent Framework for Adaptive and Reproducible Medical Image Processing
arXiv AIArchived Apr 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.21936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical imaging research is increasingly shifting from controlled benchmark evaluation toward real-world clinical deployment. In such settings, applying analytical methods extends beyond model design to require dataset-aware workflow configuration and provenance tracking. Two requirements therefore become central: \textbf{adaptability}, the ability to configure workflows according to dataset-specific conditions and evolving analytical goals; and \t
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 31 Mar 2026]
An Artifact-based Agent Framework for Adaptive and Reproducible Medical Image Processing
Lianrui Zuo, Yihao Liu, Gaurav Rudravaram, Karthik Ramadass, Aravind R. Krishnan, Michael D. Phillips, Yelena G. Bodien, Mayur B. Patel, Paula Trujillo, Yency Forero Martinez, Stephen A. Deppen, Eric L. Grogan, Fabien Maldonado, Kevin McGann, Hudson M. Holmes, Laurie E. Cutting, Yuankai Huo, Bennett A. Landman
Medical imaging research is increasingly shifting from controlled benchmark evaluation toward real-world clinical deployment. In such settings, applying analytical methods extends beyond model design to require dataset-aware workflow configuration and provenance tracking. Two requirements therefore become central: \textbf{adaptability}, the ability to configure workflows according to dataset-specific conditions and evolving analytical goals; and \textbf{reproducibility}, the guarantee that all transformations and decisions are explicitly recorded and re-executable. Here, we present an artifact-based agent framework that introduces a semantic layer to augment medical image processing. The framework formalizes intermediate and final outputs through an artifact contract, enabling structured interrogation of workflow state and goal-conditioned assembly of configurations from a modular rule library. Execution is delegated to a workflow executor to preserve deterministic computational graph construction and provenance tracking, while the agent operates locally to comply with most privacy constraints. We evaluate the framework on real-world clinical CT and MRI cohorts, demonstrating adaptive configuration synthesis, deterministic reproducibility across repeated executions, and artifact-grounded semantic querying. These results show that adaptive workflow configuration can be achieved without compromising reproducibility in heterogeneous clinical environments.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21936 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.21936v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21936
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Lianrui Zuo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:28:11 UTC (4,413 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
cs.MA
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)